Home
About NAQT
Members
Rules
Upcoming
Tournaments
Hosting
Results
Newsletters
Eligibility
Jobs
Links
Contact Us
How To...
Sample
Questions
Buy Practice
Questions
You Gotta
Know...
References
Downloads
Podcasts
2008 ICT
2008 HS NCT
Standings
Individuals
Scoreboard
Team Detail
Individual Detail
Stat Key
2005 NAQT ICT Division I Standings
Hellman
Team
W
L
Pct
PPG
PAPG
Mrg
15
10
-5
TUH
PPTH
P/N
BHrd
BPts
P/B
1
Michigan A
13
0
1.000
436.5
147.3
289.2
46
150
34
312
18.19
1.35
196
3655
18.65
2
Chicago A
12
1
0.923
447.7
173.8
273.8
52
145
37
324
17.96
1.41
197
3775
19.16
3
Rochester
10
3
0.769
275.0
207.3
67.7
19
124
30
298
12.00
0.63
143
2200
15.38
4
Illinois A
9
4
0.692
335.8
202.3
133.5
46
117
34
310
14.08
1.35
163
2675
16.41
4
Stanford
9
4
0.692
255.8
227.3
28.5
11
129
18
305
10.90
0.61
140
1960
14.00
6
Berkeley
8
5
0.615
320.4
230.4
90.0
31
135
36
313
13.31
0.86
166
2530
15.24
7
Florida
6
7
0.462
224.2
280.4
-56.2
21
101
29
309
9.43
0.72
122
1735
14.22
7
Yale
6
7
0.462
202.3
254.2
-51.9
11
106
24
314
8.38
0.46
117
1525
13.03
Jackson
Team
W
L
Pct
PPG
PAPG
Mrg
15
10
-5
TUH
PPTH
P/N
BHrd
BPts
P/B
9
VCU (UG)
9
4
0.692
266.9
211.9
55.0
18
131
15
311
11.16
1.20
149
1965
13.19
9
Princeton
9
4
0.692
237.3
200.8
36.5
14
121
35
299
10.32
0.40
135
1840
13.63
11
Carleton (UG)
1
8
5
0.615
230.0
193.5
36.5
6
119
6
302
9.90
1.00
125
1740
13.92
11
Harvard (UG)
1
8
5
0.615
225.8
197.7
28.1
10
130
44
307
9.56
0.23
140
1705
12.18
11
Emory
8
5
0.615
216.9
199.2
17.7
11
115
17
292
9.66
0.65
124
1590
12.82
14
South Florida A
7
6
0.538
241.2
199.2
41.9
17
112
17
298
10.52
1.00
129
1845
14.30
14
Michigan B
7
6
0.538
186.2
211.9
-25.8
16
97
36
299
8.09
0.44
113
1390
12.30
16
Vanderbilt
4
9
0.308
174.6
216.5
-41.9
7
102
29
294
7.72
0.24
109
1290
11.83
1-Carleton defeated Harvard 250-170 in a playoff for the right to contest the UG final.
Lafitte
Team
W
L
Pct
PPG
PAPG
Mrg
15
10
-5
TUH
PPTH
P/N
BHrd
BPts
P/B
17
Rutgers-NB
9
4
0.692
215.4
198.8
16.5
9
121
5
297
9.43
1.80
130
1480
11.38
18
UCLA
7
6
0.538
231.2
197.3
33.8
12
112
27
301
9.98
0.44
124
1840
14.84
19
British Columbia
6
7
0.462
187.3
198.1
-10.8
11
99
22
307
7.93
0.50
110
1390
12.64
19
Williams (UG)
6
7
0.462
176.9
166.5
10.4
14
105
28
296
7.77
0.50
119
1180
9.92
21
Virginia
5
8
0.385
136.9
220.8
-83.8
3
92
30
308
5.78
0.10
95
965
10.16
22
Columbia
4
9
0.308
175.8
221.2
-45.4
12
91
24
306
7.47
0.50
103
1315
12.77
22
Maryland (UG)
4
9
0.308
145.4
211.2
-65.8
4
90
25
291
6.49
0.16
94
1055
11.22
22
Louisiana State
4
9
0.308
112.7
234.2
-121.5
10
75
30
313
4.68
0.33
85
715
8.41
Oliver
Team
W
L
Pct
PPG
PAPG
Mrg
15
10
-5
TUH
PPTH
P/N
BHrd
BPts
P/B
25
Illinois B (UG)
7
6
0.538
174.6
181.9
-7.3
11
97
13
308
7.37
0.85
108
1200
11.11
26
Brandeis (UG)
6
7
0.462
151.5
193.5
-41.9
9
93
24
317
6.21
0.38
102
1025
10.05
27
Minnesota (UG)
5
8
0.385
135.8
187.3
-51.5
12
80
34
316
5.59
0.35
92
955
10.38
28
South Florida B
4
9
0.308
129.2
204.2
-75.0
8
88
31
317
5.30
0.26
96
835
8.70
28
Chicago B
4
9
0.308
115.4
225.0
-109.6
2
85
17
307
4.89
0.12
87
705
8.10
30
Swarthmore (UG)
3
10
0.231
150.8
186.2
-35.4
8
88
20
298
6.58
0.40
96
1060
11.04
31
Rice (UG)
1
12
0.077
101.2
233.1
-131.9
2
77
28
310
4.24
0.07
79
655
8.29
32
Valencia CC
0
13
0.000
46.5
250.0
-203.5
5
42
23
309
1.96
0.22
47
225
4.79
The NAQT website is maintained by
Chad Kubicek