2015 MSNCT Survey

This survey gathered feedback from players and coaches about NAQT’s 2015 Middle School National Championship Tournament. There were 439 responses.

Some questions have responses that don’t total to exactly 100%; this is due to the rounding of individual values. Percentages reported are of those answering each individual question, since not all respondents answered every question. In most cases, nonzero values that round to 0% are not shown.

Respondent

What is your role?

81%
Player
10%
Coach
4%
Other
4%
Not Specified

Did you stay in the tournament hotel?

88%
Yes
12%
No

Spectators

How many spectators (siblings, friends, parents, but not coaches or players) did your team bring to the MSNCT?

7%
0
12%
1
7%
2
7%
3
10%
4
11%
5
9%
6
7%
7
8%
8
2%
9
4%
10
6%
11–15
4%
16–20
5%
>20

Distribution

For each category, please indicate whether you would like to see many more, more, the same, fewer, or many fewer questions in that area at a future MSNCT. The “%” column contains the current percentage of the set devoted to that category.

Subject Area % Many fewer Fewer Same More Much More
Current Events 6.9% 3% 14% 41% 28% 14%
Fine Arts 4.9% 8% 14% 41% 26% 10%
General Knowledge / Mixed 6.9% 2% 6% 54% 28% 10%
Geography 9.9% 4% 16% 38% 27% 16%
History 19.8% 4% 17% 47% 18% 14%
Language 2.0% 8% 15% 44% 26% 7%
Literature 15.8% 10% 20% 37% 21% 13%
Mathematics 8.0% 15% 26% 36% 14% 9%
Pop Culture 5.2% 9% 14% 27% 28% 21%
Science 16.9% 5% 12% 46% 24% 14%
Social Science / Philosophy 2.0% 6% 16% 49% 21% 8%
Sports 1.7% 17% 14% 31% 15% 23%

How many computation questions per game (fractional answers acceptable) should NAQT include at future MSNCTs?

Answers were rounded to the nearest 0.5. Non-numeric answers and answers not between 0 and 24 (inclusive) were ignored.

Questions Tossups Bonuses
0 39% 20%
0.5 4% 5%
1 28% 42%
1.5 1% 2%
2 14% 18%
2.5 1% 0%
3 5% 7%
4 2% 1%
5 2% 1%
7 1% 1%
9 0% 1%
10 1% 1%
20 1% 0%

At a future tournament, would you pay $20 extra to receive a report after the tournament detailing your team’s performance by category and question type (for example: 7 of 9 on Opera tossups, 13 of 18 on Biology bonus parts)?

51%
Yes
49%
No

Difficulty

For each category, please indicate whether you thought the questions in those categories at the 2015 MSNCT were too hard, about right, or too easy.

Category Too easy About right Too hard
Current Events 5% 72% 23%
Fine Arts 5% 72% 23%
General Knowledge / Mixed 5% 90% 4%
Geography 5% 78% 17%
History 3% 84% 13%
Language 9% 75% 16%
Literature 4% 75% 21%
Mathematics 6% 61% 33%
Pop Culture 11% 79% 10%
Science 4% 78% 18%
Social Science / Philosophy 3% 76% 21%
Sports 10% 65% 24%

Logistics

How did you travel to the 2015 MSNCT?

74%
air
25%
private car(s)
1%
other/combination

From 0 to 5, with 0 being “not at all important” and 5 being “critically important,” please rate these aspects of a host hotel:

Answers were rounded to the nearest integer. Non-numeric answers and answers not between 0 and 5 (inclusive) were ignored.

Aspect 5 4 3 2 1 0
Accessibility by free airport shuttle or efficient public transit 49% 20% 19% 6% 2% 4%
Walking distance to major tourist attractions 22% 16% 25% 17% 8% 11%
Walking distance to inexpensive (less than $10) restaurants 37% 24% 21% 8% 3% 6%
Hotel recreation (gym, pool, sport courts, etc.) 29% 17% 18% 16% 9% 11%
Sufficient meeting space (no games played in suite parlors) 41% 22% 19% 8% 4% 6%
Complimentary guest room internet access 70% 15% 9% 3% 1% 2%
Refrigerators in guest rooms 28% 14% 20% 19% 7% 12%
Queen beds instead of double beds in guest rooms 23% 17% 22% 16% 8% 14%
Affordability 58% 25% 11% 2% 1% 3%

Which days (if any) have you taken, or do you plan to take, sightseeing trips in the Dallas/Fort Worth area during your stay?

Since the choices are not mutually exclusive, the percentages are not expected to add up to 100%.

5%
Thursday or before
39%
Friday
17%
Saturday
36%
Sunday
5%
Monday or after

Download Survey Form

Download PDF

Download Raw Data

A comma-delimited file containing all the survey responses is available for anyone wishing to delve more deeply into the results. Identifiers have been anonymized so that data from the same survey-taker and the same team can be understood as a group.

Download Excel File (XLS)