• Tournaments
• Buzzword Season 5 Level A Week 2
• Results
• Single-Game
• Current: Standings

Season 5 Level A Week 2

Standings

If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.

#	Awards	Player	Region	Grade	# Correct	% Correct	Average Correct Celerity	Std. Dev. Celerity	Score
1		Lukas Koutsoukos	Connecticut	11th	49	98.0%	.523	.246	798
2		Tate Osborne	Alabama	9th	48	96.0%	.526	.255	783
3		Aditya Shivaswamy	Texas	10th	48	96.0%	.513	.242	777
4		Ryan Presler	South Dakota	11th	48	96.0%	.436	.220	730
5		Charles Heydt	Georgia	9th	43	86.0%	.555	.249	716
6		Vedul Palavajjhala	Texas	12th	39	78.0%	.671	.187	706
7		Drew Laroo	Michigan	12th	42	84.0%	.525	.252	687
8		Omkar Bharath	Arizona	9th	47	94.0%	.381	.225	680
9		Sinecio Morales	Illinois	11th	42	84.0%	.501	.267	675
10		Brent Raleigh	Kentucky	11th	44	88.0%	.382	.241	636
11		Arnav Lahoti	Texas	10th	43	86.0%	.376	.252	620
12		Joel Jaskolski	Michigan	12th	42	84.0%	.397	.250	619
13		Rohan Ramachandran	Tennessee	9th	43	86.0%	.367	.218	617
14		Lucas Jraiche	Michigan	10th	42	84.0%	.381	.208	611
15		Caleb West	Kentucky	12th	42	84.0%	.368	.251	604
16		Joshua Freeman	Kentucky	12th	43	86.0%	.334	.274	598
17		Michael Yousif	Michigan	12th	36	72.0%	.531	.207	590
18		Brennan McKone	Michigan	10th	42	84.0%	.331	.259	586
19		Matt Abraham	Michigan	12th	40	80.0%	.363	.281	574
20		Isaac Napier	Ohio	11th	41	82.0%	.325	.234	568
21		Will McCollom	Arizona	9th	41	82.0%	.317	.247	563
22		Evie Austin	Michigan	11th	42	84.0%	.284	.236	559
23		Brady McKillop	Michigan	12th	39	78.0%	.325	.245	536
24		George Ahnutae	Ohio	11th	40	80.0%	.293	.253	535
25		Nathaniel Williams	Illinois	11th	40	80.0%	.278	.237	525
26		Lemuel Chan	Illinois	10th	41	82.0%	.245	.213	523
27		Scott Goebel	Illinois	11th	40	80.0%	.265	.239	519
28		Christophe Savoie	Florida	10th	41	82.0%	.221	.229	515
29		Curtis Roselle	Illinois	10th	41	82.0%	.209	.203	507
30		Patrick Szendro	Michigan	12th	36	72.0%	.337	.252	505
31		Corbin Montenegro	Kansas	11th	38	76.0%	.282	.227	500
32		Dominic Aiello	Michigan	11th	37	74.0%	.294	.219	494
33		Dominic Apap	Michigan	10th	43	86.0%	.132	.180	489
34		Alex Brenia	Maryland	12th	36	72.0%	.292	.243	482
35		Lily Pena	Georgia	10th	39	78.0%	.199	.198	480
36		Anthony Chalhoub	Michigan	11th	37	74.0%	.239	.254	476
37		Julianne Latimer	Kentucky	12th	38	76.0%	.222	.238	476
38		Liam Cross	Michigan	12th	30	60.0%	.481	.300	475
39		Kaitlyn Williams	Florida	12th	36	72.0%	.279	.239	474
40		Maddie Baldwin	Michigan	10th	36	72.0%	.263	.272	472
41		Jude Laskey	Michigan	12th	30	60.0%	.473	.245	471
42		Denver Haslett	Illinois	12th	36	72.0%	.258	.242	467
43		Daniel Luebs	Michigan	10th	36	72.0%	.242	.250	462
44		Alex Partlan	Michigan	10th	35	70.0%	.270	.211	460
45		Nick Murray	Michigan	9th	32	64.0%	.358	.270	456
46		Conner Rose	Michigan	12th	34	68.0%	.288	.254	456
47		Michael Rubin	Florida	11th	38	76.0%	.184	.204	454
48		William Kerwin	Illinois	10th	39	78.0%	.139	.173	450
49		Adam Gribbins	Illinois	12th	31	62.0%	.369	.259	443
50		Mary Simpson	Illinois	12th	36	72.0%	.199	.225	441
51		Mark McDonald	Illinois	10th	36	72.0%	.190	.212	437
52		Suna Tabag	Illinois	10th	35	70.0%	.214	.216	435
53		Christopher Goolsby	Michigan	9th	34	68.0%	.239	.214	434
54		Ben Tuxhorn	Illinois	9th	33	66.0%	.271	.222	430
55		Dylan Cregar	Michigan	9th	35	70.0%	.197	.207	426
56		Gavin Williams	Michigan	12th	31	62.0%	.295	.269	421
57		Carter Pitts	Florida	12th	35	70.0%	.176	.183	419
58		Daniel Moore	Michigan	10th	33	66.0%	.189	.214	400
59		Abby Stalets	Illinois	11th	35	70.0%	.107	.158	389
60		Ben Towne	Michigan	9th	29	58.0%	.286	.249	388
61		Jacob Barta	Michigan	9th	31	62.0%	.206	.240	384
62		Ryan Nantz	Kentucky	12th	26	52.0%	.394	.236	382
63		Adam Transue	Illinois	12th	29	58.0%	.246	.192	373
64		Isabel Moon	Florida	12th	32	64.0%	.146	.191	372
65		Mikey Cozza	Arizona	9th	30	60.0%	.205	.223	371
66		Nicholas Burris	Illinois	12th	31	62.0%	.168	.227	371
67		Andrew Kil	Michigan	11th	29	58.0%	.214	.252	362
68		John Greene	Michigan	12th	23	46.0%	.458	.234	357
69		Ben Yancey	Michigan	9th	31	62.0%	.125	.181	355
70		Carson Blaney	Illinois	10th	29	58.0%	.188	.214	350
71		Katrina Baiza-Urtaza	Florida	12th	31	62.0%	.111	.136	348
72		Lily Brantner	Maryland	9th	30	60.0%	.147	.166	347
73		Emily Fletcher	Texas	10th	30	60.0%	.139	.219	345
74		Aiden Garland-Sutter	Illinois	12th	32	64.0%	.071	.123	343
75		Oliver Kammeraad	Michigan	10th	26	52.0%	.267	.228	340
76		Rebekah Greer	Florida	11th	31	62.0%	.078	.110	337
77		Luke Gribbins	Illinois	10th	28	56.0%	.161	.183	331
78		Christian Bakkal	Michigan	9th	30	60.0%	.077	.184	324
79		Carter Steele	Illinois	12th	29	58.0%	.105	.147	322
80		Augustine Cabello	Michigan	10th	24	48.0%	.276	.261	315
81		Mason Caton	Kentucky	10th	25	50.0%	.189	.188	305
82		Margaret Randolph	Maryland	9th	25	50.0%	.185	.219	304
83		Mairead Zuver	Illinois	10th	25	50.0%	.170	.206	300
84		Calum Sarfert	Florida	9th	28	56.0%	.075	.122	300
85		Collin Steele	Illinois	10th	28	56.0%	.068	.095	300
86		Davis Starzacher	Michigan	9th	28	56.0%	.065	.160	300
87		Caitlin Lauwerens	Illinois	12th	26	52.0%	.135	.156	297
88		Lacy Steck	Illinois	9th	26	52.0%	.119	.144	294
89		Nico Pascual	Michigan	12th	21	42.0%	.328	.242	291
90		Cameron Lovell	Michigan	10th	25	50.0%	.114	.153	282
91		Gregory Nemeth	Florida	12th	21	42.0%	.221	.197	261
92		Patrick Burke	Michigan	9th	23	46.0%	.119	.124	259
93		Blaine Hodel	Illinois	9th	23	46.0%	.061	.104	244
94		Drew Cholak	Michigan	9th	20	40.0%	.135	.135	231
95		Avery Briggs	Illinois	9th	22	44.0%	.028	.157	225
96		Patrick Phillips	Michigan	9th	19	38.0%	.099	.169	210
97		Charley Nelson-Pawlik	Michigan	9th	18	36.0%	.131	.226	206
98		Claire Carley	Illinois	9th	17	34.0%	.161	.157	198
99		Claire Rhodes	Ohio	10th	16	32.0%	.139	.182	185
100		Samantha Bandy	Illinois	9th	17	34.0%	.060	.111	181
101		Katherine Vickroy	Ohio	10th	8	34.8%	.192	.181	98
102		Abby Salisbury	Kentucky	12th	1	33.3%	.411	.235	15
103		Audrey Gerberding	Illinois	10th	0	0.0%	-1.000	.421	0

Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.