Official NAQT Rules(Copyright © 2015 NAQT)
Sections of these rules marked in red were changed prior to the 2015–16 competition year.
- General Information
Official NAQT rules are maintained at:
This version is current as of August 1, 2015.
- These rules are intended (but not required) for use by tournaments using questions provided by NAQT.
- Tournaments not using NAQT questions may use these rules at no charge provided that:
- The rules are identified as NAQT rules.
- Any variations from official NAQT rules are announced before the tournament begins.
- The tournament is not advertised as using NAQT questions.
NAQT is notified within ten days after the end of the event of the tournament name and date, and any rule variations used.
- If you would like to use these rules
given the conditions stated above, orunder other circumstances, please contact NAQT by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org, by phone at 1‑888‑411‑6278 (“NAQT”), or by mail at 11521 W. 69th Street; Shawnee, KS 66203–3749.
- Tournament Officials
- Each tournament will have a single tournament director who may, at his or her discretion, designate agents or committees to make rulings. All decisions of the tournament director and his or her designees are final.
- Each game will have a moderator. The moderator will read the questions, enforce time limits, supervise the clock, determine the correctness of responses, award and deduct points, and otherwise enforce the rules of competition.
- Other officials may be provided to assist the moderator with his or her duties including, but not limited to, keeping a running score, recognizing players that signal, and supervising the clock.
- The moderator may consult with other game officials or tournament officials at any time to determine the correctness of an answer or the proper application of these rules. If the moderator and other game officials disagree, the
finaldecision rests with the moderator. In some cases, a moderator’s decision may be protested, leading to review by the tournament director.
- The tournament director may consult with game officials, outside experts, governing bodies, NAQT itself, or other relevant authorities to ensure a properly run tournament and proper adjudication of protests and anomalous situations.
- If unexpected circumstances make it impossible to follow these rules (e.g., computer failure makes it impossible to provide supplemental questions or a medical emergency requires a team to leave in the middle of a match), the tournament director may adopt an alternative course of action that best embodies the goals of these rules and the spirit of the competition.
- Matches should be played with a lockout system (“buzzer”), electronic equipment that determines which player signaled first. Each individual player should have an independent signaling device, such as a button, to activate the system. Should no working lockout system be available, tournament officials may require players to signal by other means (e.g., slapping the table).
- In the absence of a fully functional lockout system, teams may agree to use a partially working lockout system. If either team objects, the game will be played or resumed without a lockout system.
- If a game is played without a
fullyfunctional lockout system, a designated official (who might be the moderator) will be the final judge of which player signaled first. These determinations are not protestable.
- If a player objects to using a
workinglockout system because of religious or other reasons, the player and the tournament director may jointly devise an alternate method of signaling. A designated official (who might be the moderator) will be the final judge of which player signaled first. These determinations are not protestable.
- Each player is responsible for monitoring whether his or her own signaling device is operating properly throughout a match.
- If a lockout system malfunctions, only the current tossup or the just completed tossup can be replayed, subject to the moderator’s determination that the malfunction affected play of that question. This determination is not protestable. This rule applies even if the lockout system was not officially tested prior to the beginning of the match.
- If a player believes a previously working lockout system has malfunctioned, he or she may signal in an alternate way (e.g., loudly saying “buzz”). The moderator may accept such an alternate signal (and thus permit the player to give a response) if the moderator believes the system did malfunction and that the player was, in fact, the first (or only) player to signal. This determination is not protestable.
- If a functioning lockout system is available and no objection has been raised to its use, a player may only signal by using that lockout system. That is, alternate methods of signaling may not be adopted on the fly out of convenience or confusion (except in the case of a malfunction of a previously working system as provided for in Rule C.7).
- If a lockout system is not properly reset (“cleared”) prior to a tossup question, active players or coaches may try to quickly inform the moderator of the situation by saying “Clear” or similar phrases. Such utterances will not be considered illegal conferring (as per Rule G.12), and they will not be considered an attempt to signal (as per Rule C.7).
- Matches should use a clock clearly visible to both teams, preferably one with an alarm that will sound at the end of the half.
- All participants are presumed to be responsible individuals and will be treated as such. Players and schools are responsible for any liability arising from their conduct while at the tournament, or while traveling to or from such events.
- A team consists of any number of players who meet all eligibility rules. However, no more than four of a team’s players may be actively competing at any one time. Teams may play short, with a minimum of one player.
- No player may play for two different teams in the course of a single tournament.
- Each team will designate a captain prior to the beginning of each match. The captain has precedence when answering bonus questions and is expected to be the primary student spokesperson for the team. If no explicit designation is made, the moderator may infer the captaincy from team behavior on bonus questions or in other situations. A team may change its captain at any time substitutions are allowed (even if no substitutions are actually made).
- A team may substitute one or more players at halftime, during a timeout by either team, or before the first overtime question. Players substituted for may re-enter the game at a later opportunity. If a team has fewer than four players, a player may enter the game without replacing another player at those times. In addition, a player may leave the game (without being replaced) at those times (so long as the team still has at least one active player).
- A coach is a person who acts in a recognized advisory role to a particular team. A coach may not be a player for any team in the tournament. A team can have an unlimited number of coaches or no coach, but only one may be designated the official coach prior to each match. A team may change its official coach at halftime, during a timeout, or before the first overtime question. A person may act as a coach, official or otherwise, for any number of teams. If a team has only a single coach, that person will be assumed to be the official coach.
- Each game uses tossup questions worth 10 points each (or 15 points if answered before the power mark), and multiple-answer bonus questions worth a total of 30 points each.
- Whenever a player answers a tossup question correctly, his or her team earns the chance to immediately hear a bonus question (except in overtime).
- A tossup-bonus cycle consists of the gameplay that begins with the start of a tossup and concludes when either:
- Both teams fail to correctly answer the tossup (having been given the proper opportunity to do so), or
- The bonus earned for answering the tossup is completed. (This does not apply during overtime.)
- The tournament director may declare that a team has forfeited a match should it fail to appear on time, or if the team is otherwise unable or unwilling to compete in accordance with the tournament’s rules.
- A game consists of two timed halves. If the score is tied at the end of the game, an overtime period will be played.
- Intercollegiate matches, including community college matches, will use 10-minute halves.
- All other matches will use 9-minute halves.
- If all of the tossup questions provided for a game have been read, the game is over (even if time remains on the clock). However, if one or more tossups had to be replaced during the match and the potential score change due to the shortfall could change the outcome of the game, then the moderator will acquire supplemental tossups equal to the number that were replaced and continue the game until time expires or the supplemental tossups are exhausted. For example, if the game packet includes 24 tossups but only 23 are officially read (because moderator error required that 1 be replaced), then the moderator shall acquire 1 supplemental tossup if there is time on the clock and the trailing team is within 50 points.
- If all of the bonus questions provided for a game have been read, but a team earns a bonus, the moderator shall acquire a supplemental bonus.
- The clock starts when the moderator begins reading the first tossup question.
When the clock sounds the end of time, the half or game shall end with the conclusion of the current tossup-bonus cycle. In particular:
- If the moderator has just finished a bonus question or an unanswered tossup question and has not yet begun the next tossup, then the half or game is over. A tossup is considered to have been begun when the first syllable of the actual question is read. Preliminary statements (e.g., “Here’s the next tossup” or “Tossup 23”) do not count as having started the tossup.
- If the moderator is reading a tossup question, then he or she shall continue reading it, giving both teams a chance to answer, and their full time allotment to signal. If the tossup is answered correctly, that team will earn a bonus question. If the tossup goes unanswered, then the half or game is over.
- If the moderator is reading a bonus question, then the half or game shall end when that bonus has been completed.
- A team will be read its entire bonus question, even if time expires during the bonus or before the bonus is begun.
The team with more points at the end of the game wins. If the score is tied:
- An off-the-clock overtime period consisting of three tossup questions will follow. These tossup questions are scored normally (including power points and interrupt penalties). Bonus questions are not used in overtime. These tossups will be read from the original set (if unread tossups remain) or may be obtained from the tournament director.
- If the score is still tied after three tossups, the moderator will read tossup questions until the score changes. These tossups will be read from the original set (if unread tossups remain) or may be obtained from the tournament director. The game ends immediately if a team receives an interrupt penalty.
The clock shall not stop, except:
- At the end of the half.
- When a timeout is called.
- When a game official needs to adjudicate a procedural protest or other serious problem; to discipline, warn, or eject a player; to replace a question; or to acquire replacement or supplemental questions when necessary.
- If the moderator needs more than 2 seconds to consult with other game officials or to determine the content or acceptability of a response.
- Each team has one 30-second timeout per game. Timeouts do not carry over from game to game, nor are teams given additional timeouts in overtime periods.
- Only an active player or official coach may call a timeout. A timeout is called by saying “timeout” or “time.”
- A timeout may be called only before the beginning of a tossup question. Once a tossup-bonus cycle has begun, a team cannot call a timeout for the duration of that cycle.
- Game officials will ignore any attempt to call a timeout at any other time, unless they consider such an attempt unsporting behavior.
- Game officials will also ignore any attempt to call a timeout by a team that has already called one. Repeated or disruptive attempts to call additional timeouts may be considered game-delaying tactics and result in a player’s warning or ejection.
- The timepiece used by the game officials is the official time
and is not protestable.
- The timeliness with which the clock is started at the beginning of a half or with which it is started and/or stopped at other points in the game is not protestable unless a discrepancy exceeding 5 seconds is alleged.
- A player may signal to answer a tossup question at any point after the moderator has begun reading the question. Only one player per team may signal to answer each tossup question. A player who signals before the question has been read in its entirety is said to have interrupted the tossup.
- When a player has signaled, a game official will acknowledge (“recognize”) the player by name, by number, by pointing toward the player, or merely by looking at the player. There is no penalty if a player who has signaled answers before being acknowledged.
- If a player signals before the moderator has finished reading the question, the moderator will stop at that point. If the response given is incorrect, the moderator will finish the question for the other team only (if the other team is still eligible to answer the question). The moderator should not reread the entire question, but should resume as close as possible to the point at which the signal occurred.
- An answer to a tossup must begin within 2 seconds after the player has been recognized. An answer begun after the moderator has said “Time” will be treated as no answer. Ties between the player and the moderator calling time are decided in favor of the player.
- Players have 3 seconds to signal after the moderator has finished reading the tossup. If the player answers incorrectly, the other team (if it is eligible to answer), will then have 3 more seconds to signal. Some questions may permit more time, which will be noted specifically by the question.
Computation tossups (marked by text that begins “Pencil and paper ready”) have slightly different timing rules:
- Teams have 10 seconds (not 3) to ring in after the moderator finishes the question. If the first team signals before the end of the question, the second team will have the full 10 seconds to signal after the reading of the question is completed.
- If the first team signals after the end of the question, the moderator will allow whatever time remained of the initial 10 seconds (or 3 seconds, whichever is greater) for the second team to signal.
- Despite this additional time, players still have only 2 seconds to give their answer after signaling on a computation tossup.
- If a computation tossup specifies a different time limit than 10 seconds, that time limit shall be used instead.
- Decisions as to whether players have exceeded the allotted time to signal or to answer are made by the moderator and are not protestable.
- Each tossup question is worth 10 points. In addition, tossups have power marks (denoted by an asterisk). A player earns 15 points for a correct answer to a tossup if the player signals before the moderator has completed the first syllable after the mark. The moment of judgment is when the player signals, not when the moderator stops reading
, so it is critical that moderators stop instantly once they hear a signal. Ties between the player and the moderator are decided in favor of the player. The determination of whether a tie occurred is not protestable, and the effect on the game of a moderator failing to stop reading immediately is not protestable.
- There is a 5-point interrupt penalty (“neg five” or “minus five”) if the first team interrupts a tossup with an incorrect response. A subsequent incorrect interrupt by the second team does not result in another penalty. The second team may still earn 15 points with a sufficiently early signal. Players may earn 15 points on power tossups at any point in the game, including overtime.
If a player who has not signaled gives a response:
- If no other player has signaled, the response shall be treated as illegal conferring (see Rule G.12) by the player who gave it.
- If the player who responds is not on the same team as a player who did signal, the moderator will ignore the response (even if it is correct), and will recognize the player
on the other teamwho actually signaled. Only that player will have a chance to respond, as the non-signaler has disqualified his team on that tossup question by illegal conferral (see Rule G.12).
- If the player who responds is a teammate of the player who did signal, and the responses are given simultaneously, the moderator will ignore the player who did not signal and evaluate the response from the player who did. No illegal conferring is called in this case, and the determination of simultaneity is not protestable.
- If a teammate of the player who signaled gives a response before the player who signaled gives a response, the moderator will treat that response as illegal conferring (see Rule G.12) by the player who had not signaled.
- If a teammate of the player who signaled gives a response after the player who signaled gives a response, the moderator will ignore the player who didn’t signal and evaluate the response from the player who did. No illegal conferring is called in this case.
- If a player answers because an official incorrectly identified who signaled first, the tossup must be replaced. The determination of whether a moderator correctly or incorrectly identified a player is not protestable.
- If the moderator inadvertently reveals the answer to a tossup question after one team has given an incorrect answer, but before the other team has had a chance to answer, the moderator will read a replacement tossup for the second team only, off the clock. If neither team has had a chance to answer, the tossup question is thrown out and replaced off the clock. The clock is turned back on for a bonus.
- Players may engage in non-verbal, non-written conferral with teammates (not alternates, coaches, or spectators) on tossup questions, provided that the conferring does not convey any information about the substance of the answer. In other words, players may hold their signaling devices forward, gesticulate, or otherwise indicate that they know the answer, but cannot indicate in any manner what they believe the answer to be, nor can they communicate with teammates verbally or in writing. Illegal conferring on a tossup question (including cases of players responding without having signaled) will be treated as an incorrect response (including the assessment of an interrupt penalty if it occurred prior to the end of the tossup question and the other team had not already responded).
- Like interrupt penalties for incorrect answers, interrupt penalties assessed for illegal conferring also preclude subsequent interrupt penalties (assessed against the other team). The rule that no more than one 5-point penalty be assessed per tossup question is absolute.
- If players on both teams simultaneously confer illegally, the moderator shall not award an interrupt penalty, but shall instead simply treat the tossup question as unanswered. This determination of simultaneity is not protestable.
- A moderator may disregard a signal that he or she deems to be inadvertent (e.g., a signal when all that has been said is “This man” or a signal resulting from a dropped signaling device). The determination of whether a signal is inadvertent is not protestable.
- Bonus questions are never skipped. For example, if neither team answers tossup question #1, but a team correctly answers tossup question #2, it will then hear bonus question #1 (as it is the first unread bonus question). The effect on the game of inadvertently skipping a bonus is not protestable. A moderator may return to an inadvertently skipped bonus in the future.
- Teams may confer on bonus questions. It is recommended that the captain give the answer for the team or clearly indicate who will give the answer. The moderator, however, will take the first answer unambiguously directed at him or her. If conflicting answers are directed at the moderator, the captain will be asked to choose the team’s answer. The determination of whether an answer was directed at the moderator is not protestable.
- A team has 5 seconds to answer each part of a bonus question, unless otherwise noted by the question. After reading each part, the moderator will prompt the team for an answer after 4 seconds. Once prompted, someone on that team must begin answering, or the captain must immediately designate the person who will answer.
- A team may begin its answer before the end of a bonus question. In such cases, the moderator stops reading when the team begins its answer. If the bonus contains another part, the moderator then asks the next part. This happens even if the part asks for more than one piece of information and the team gives only one; a risk of answering the bonus while it is being read is that a team might miss the fact that it is asking for multiple pieces of information.
- If the bonus question contains multiple parts, a team may answer only the part that is being read. For this purpose, any “introduction” (e.g., “For 10 points each—given a vice president of the United States, name the president under whom he served.”) is considered to belong to the first part of the question.
- A team may decline the chance to answer an entire bonus question or the remaining parts of a bonus question if the captain says, “We pass the rest of the bonus,” “No answer for the entire bonus,” or makes a similar declaration that explicitly refers to multiple parts. In such a case, the moderator should stop reading immediately, award any points earned on parts that were heard, and begin the next tossup question. In this case the moderator should not read the correct answers to the skipped parts.
- If a bonus question calls for multiple answers, the response must be given as a continuous list. Any pause of 1 second ends the response. The moderator will not prompt a team to complete a partial response.
- If a moderator inadvertently reveals the answer to a part of a bonus before the team has answered, the entire next bonus will be read as a replacement. However, the team may not earn more or fewer points on the replacement bonus than would have been possible with the completion of the original bonus. For example: a team earns 10 points on the first two parts of a three-part bonus before the moderator botches the third part; the team will get a replacement bonus, but will receive at least 10 points (even if it actually scores 0 points on the replacement bonus) and no more than 20 points (even if it answers every part of the replacement bonus correctly). Such replacement bonuses are read off the clock.
- If a team receives an anomalous bonus valued at fewer than 30 points, it may request a replacement. If it chooses to keep the lesser valued bonus at the time of play, it will stand. A request for a replacement must be made as soon as it becomes apparent that the bonus is not worth 30 points. The replacement bonus does not have minimum or maximum scores, regardless of the team’s performance on the original, anomalous bonus.
- If a team receives an anomalous bonus valued at more than 30 points, it must be replaced as soon as it becomes apparent that the bonus is not worth 30 points. The replacement bonus does not have minimum or maximum scores, regardless of the team’s performance on the original, anomalous bonus.
- Correct Answers
- To receive credit, a response must indicate accurate (“correct”) and precise (“unambiguous”) knowledge of the answer. The moderator’s question packet will list acceptable alternate answers. The minimal information for a correct answer is underlined (e.g., Abraham Lincoln or An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations).
- To be considered accurate, a response must generally be compatible with every clue in the question. Some questions may allow alternative answers that are to be considered accurate at various points in the question (e.g., accept Arthur Wellesley before “Wellesley”).
- A moderator may prompt for a clarified response in three cases:
- If a player gives an answer that could be interpreted as compatible with the clues that have been read (in the case of a tossup) or with the entire part (in the case of a bonus), but which is ambiguous, the moderator will prompt by saying something like “more information, please” (e.g., a player says Roosevelt, and the answer sought is Eleanor Roosevelt).
- If a player gives an answer that is compatible with the clues that have been read (in the case of a tossup) or with the entire part (in the case of a bonus), but which is too general or too specific to be considered precise, the moderator may also prompt. For example, a question beginning, “During World War II, the primary target of the Blitz was . . .” may have the moderator prompt on responses of United Kingdom or England if it is looking for London. Some responses may be too general to warrant prompting (e.g., a response of Northern Hemisphere for a question beginning, “This region is home to the Yenets people, and it . . .”).
- If a player interrupts a bonus part and gives a response that is equivalent to the answer but which appears in the unheard portion of the clue, he or she will be prompted. For example, if a bonus part read, “Name this author of Tom Sawyer who was born Samuel Clemens” and the player interrupted after “Sawyer” to say Clemens, the moderator would prompt.
- Prompting for a clarified response is governed by these rules:
- The moderator’s question packet will list promptable responses. It may also list responses that should not be prompted.
- Unless otherwise noted by the question, the moderator will not state what type of information is sought by the prompt (e.g., it would be inappropriate for the moderator to say “I need a first name.”) On a multiple-answer bonus, however, the moderator should indicate which part of the response is ambiguous (e.g., “I need more on Roosevelt.”).
- A moderator may prompt more than once so long as each further response by the player demonstrates additional knowledge that is correct, but still imprecise.
- A player who has been prompted on a tossup question has an additional 2 seconds to provide a revised response.
- A team that has been prompted on a bonus has an additional 2 seconds to provide a revised response. This revised response follows the usual rules for answering a bonus (the captain is expected to answer, an answer from another player directed at the moderator will be taken, a different player may be designated, etc.) except that the moderator will not prompt at the end of the 2-second period; instead, time will be called and the original response counted as incorrect.
- The moderator will accept only the first answer given by a player, except for multiple-answer questions and situations enumerated below.
- Anything a player says following the first response will be ignored unless it is acting to make the first answer more specific. For example, if a player says Nixon, Watergate, the moderator will consider only Nixon. If a player says Nixon, Fred, then the moderator will consider Fred Nixon. Similarly, matter, cold dark, is treated the same as cold dark matter.
- Modifying words before the first noun of a response are considered as one answer with the noun.
- Extraneous information preceding a response is disregarded (e.g., What is a wombat? or They’re all Californians), unless the moderator determines that the extraneous information was given in an unsporting attempt to delay the game, in which case the response is treated as incorrect (in addition to any other penalty for misconduct). Harmless or inadvertent embellishment of responses will not be penalized, so long as the embellishment does not make the response wrong.
- If a tossup or bonus part has multiple answers, a player may give multiple responses so long as there is at most a 1-second pause in between. Some questions with multiple answers will require all of the responses to be correct for any points to be awarded, others will award points for each correct response. The text of the question will explain how points are to be awarded.
Multiple responses are permissible under these situations:
- The created works rule (defined below).
- City (or specific location)-state (or equivalent)-country (or equivalent), in any combination.
- When called for by the question.
- The created works rule:
- For created works, the player may give the name of the work and its creator in either order. For example, Shakespeare’s The Tempest, The Tempest by William Shakespeare, and The Tempest, Shakespeare would all be acceptable.
- The created works rule applies to works that are created by individual humans, corporations, groups, or computers, such as books, pamphlets, essays, stories, plays, scientific theorems and theories, inventions, products, compositions, artwork, and musical compositions, but not movies. This rule also includes architectural work-architect, choreographer (or composer)-work of dance, librettist-libretto (or opera). Being able to copyright or patent the product usually establishes this rule (except for movies).
- The link between creator and created work must be obvious. One may not use this rule for instances in which the creation is a multi-faceted effort (though one such circumstance, director-movie, is separately acceptable).
- In rare cases, an otherwise acceptable answer may be ruled incorrect when it creates ambiguity with another plausible answer (e.g., even though first and last names are almost always sufficient, John Adams would not be acceptable—or promptable—for John Quincy Adams, as it creates confusion with the full name of his presidential father.)
- If a player has begun a response but wishes to change it, he or she may do so if no substantive word has been completed. The determination of whether a word is a substantive part of the response and/or has been completed is not protestable. For instance, a player may say Jeffer—Washington or This is Jeffer—Washington with the result that the moderator disregards Jeffer and evaluates Washington.
- At the end of each tossup question or bonus part, the moderator will read the correct answer if no one correctly answered. The moderator may wait until the end of the half if the answer is long or complicated. If both teams agree, the moderator may be directed to refrain from reading the correct answers. This decision must be made at the beginning of a half or during a timeout, and may be revoked at the request of either team at halftime or during a timeout.
- If the moderator determines that a response was given in an unsporting manner (e.g., to delay the game or insult an opponent), the moderator shall issue a warning or ejection to the player and shall also rule the response incorrect.
- Though not part of the official rules per se, NAQT maintains, as a separate document, Correctness Guidelines that define “accurate and precise answers” in several specific contexts (e.g., real people, fictional characters, chemical elements). NAQT questions will be written in accordance with these guidelines, and protests should be resolved using them as guidance.
- A protest is a request for clarification and (if necessary) correction of an error. Appropriate subject matter for protests includes:
- The proper evaluation of a response (e.g., “The answer of CSS Virginia should have been accepted.”),
- The correctness of the clues in a question (e.g., “There was no correct answer to that question because the clues were contradictory.”), or
- The proper application of game rules (e.g., “The moderator accepted an answer from player 4, but player 3 was the one who buzzed.”)
- Factual protests are those in the first two categories. Procedural protests are those in the third.
- Protests may not be lodged over other topics (e.g., “The desks in this game room are poorly arranged for playing quiz bowl” or “The subject matter of that question is inappropriate for this tournament.”)
- These rules specify that moderators’ judgment calls in several areas are not protestable. However, if a moderator blatantly ignores or misinterprets a rule, a team may bring this to the attention of the tournament director who may make any remedies necessary to correct a blatantly unfair situation.
- If a team has an issue with an aspect of the match that is not appropriate grounds for a protest, the team should communicate this to the moderator (if it pertains to a specific match) or the tournament director (if more general). If the moderator cannot resolve a match-specific issue to the teams’ satisfaction, it may be referred to the tournament director. Moderators and tournament directors may take any actions they deem necessary to ensure matches occur in a fair, safe, and enjoyable manner compatible with the spirit of these rules. Raising such an issue during a match should be done off-the-clock (i.e., at half-time or during a timeout).
- Protests may only be lodged by the official coach or by a player who was active when the alleged error occurred.
All protests about events in the first half must be lodged before the second half begins.All protests about events in the second halfmust be made within 5 minutes of the end of the game and before the protesting team leaves the game room. The only protest that may be lodged while the clock is running is that the moderator has just accepted a tossup answer from a player other than the one who has signaled.
- Factual protests are governed by these rules:
- Factual protests must be lodged at the end of a half, the end of the game, or during a timeout (i.e., not during gameplay).
- Factual protests are adjudicated at the end of the match (even if lodged earlier) unless both teams immediately agree on the proper resolution when the protest is lodged.
- Factual protests are only adjudicated if they affect which team wins the match. For example, if one team loses by 50 points and protests a 10-point bonus answer, the protest will not be adjudicated (even if that protest might affect statistics, such as a team’s points-per-tossup-heard or points-per-bonus, that determine playoff seeding or other future aspects of the tournament).
- Active players and official coaches may indicate their intention to lodge a factual protest during a match by quickly saying “protest.” So long as this does not disrupt or delay the game, the moderator should acknowledge the intent (by saying “noted”) and continue with the match. The nature of the protest should be taken up at half-time or at the end of the game.
- Procedural protests are governed by these rules:
- Procedural protests may be lodged at any time during a match when a rule appears to have been applied incorrectly.
- The action underlying a procedural protest must have a concrete and quantifiable effect on the game (e.g., “The score is incorrect.”) Unquantifiable factors (e.g., “The buzzer system malfunction destroyed my team’s momentum”) are not protestable.
- Procedural protests will normally be adjudicated immediately. The moderator should stop the game clock while the protest is being lodged and the resolution considered.
- If the protesting party and the moderator agree that protest resolution could be delayed until the end of the half or the end of the game without causing problems, the resolution may be so delayed.
- When lodging a protest, the protesting party should briefly explain the nature of the protest to the moderator, other game officials, and a representative of the other team.
Protestable matters include the acceptability of an answer, the execution of game procedures, scoring errors, insufficient prompting, excessive underlining, and like factors that have a concrete and quantifiable effect on the game.
- If the moderator is unable to adjudicate a protest to both teams’ satisfaction, the protest may be appealed to the tournament director.
- If a protest is upheld, the remedy is to:
- Award any points that would have been awarded if no mistake were made. For example, if a response to a bonus question was rejected when it should have been accepted, the team will be credited with the appropriate number of points.
- Remove any points that would not have been awarded if no mistake had been made. For instance, if a response to a tossup was incorrectly accepted when it should have been rejected, that team will lose the points earned on the tossup question (and any points earned on the bonus earned by answering the tossup).
- A successful protest by one team may also affect the other team’s score. For example, if a team protests that its rejected response to a tossup was actually correct, then the opposing team will lose any points it had scored on the tossup (and on its associated bonus) if the protest is upheld (as it should not have had the chance to answer the question).
- Provide opportunities for teams to score points if those opportunities would have existed had no mistake been made. For instance, if a moderator did not allow the second team a chance to respond to a tossup question after an incorrect answer by the other team, it will have a chance to answer a replacement tossup (and thus earn a bonus question).
- Take any other actions consistent with correcting a mistake in enforcing the rules (e.g., adding or removing time from the game clock, declaring an interrupt penalty in sudden-death overtime to have ended the game, replacing a lockout system).
- When considering factual protests, the tournament director should apply these remedies:
- If the clues of a tossup question contain a verifiable factual error which misled a player into giving a response, the response given will be accepted as correct only if the information available when the player signaled uniquely identified the given response. If no answer is consistent with all available information, the tossup question will be replaced as if the moderator had prematurely revealed the answer when neither team had responded (as per Rule G.11).
- If the clues of a tossup question contain a verifiable factual error which misled a player into giving no response (leading either to an unanswered question or a question answered by the opposing team), the tossup question will be replaced as if the moderator had prematurely revealed the answer when neither team had responded (as per Rule G.11).
- If the clues of a tossup question (at the point at which a player signaled) or bonus part (in its entirety, regardless of when the answer was given) uniquely specify an answer, but the packet lists a different (incorrect) answer, a player who responded with the uniquely specified (correct) answer shall have that response accepted.
If the clues of a tossup question (at the point at which a player signaled) do not uniquely specify an answer, then the tournament director should consider when the signaling occurred:
- If the player signaled prior to the end of the first sentence of the question, the response shall be treated as incorrect. That is, players may not protest that they gave an answer that was “correct when they buzzed” during the first sentence of the tossup.
- If the player signaled after the end of the first sentence, the response shall be accepted if it is correct (for all the clues that had been read) and precise. If the response was correct but imprecise (and thus should have been prompted), the remedy of Rule J.13.g should be applied.
- If the clues of a bonus part (in its entirety, regardless of when the response was given) do not uniquely specify an answer, any response that is correct and precise should be accepted. If the response was correct but ambiguous, the remedy of Rule J.13.h should be applied.
- If it is determined that a moderator improperly accepted a response (to either a tossup question or a bonus question) as correct that should merely have been prompted, the acceptance of the answer shall stand.
- If it is determined that a moderator improperly rejected a response to a tossup question that should actually have been prompted, the moderator will read a replacement tossup to the affected team off the clock. Any player on the affected team may answer the replacement tossup. If the replacement tossup is answered correctly, the team shall be considered to have answered the original tossup correctly. (This might mean that the team is credited with answering the original tossup for power even if it did not answer the replacement tossup early enough to earn power.)
- If it is determined that a moderator improperly rejected a response to a bonus question that should actually have been prompted, the moderator will read a replacement bonus as if the answer had been prematurely revealed (as per Rule H.8).
- If protest resolution involves replacing a tossup question, power points may only be earned (or an interrupt penalty assessed) if they would have been possible had no mistake been made. For instance, if a moderator reads a tossup question all the way to the end, rejects the first team’s response, and then inadvertently reveals the answer before the second team has a chance to respond, then power points cannot be earned by the second team on its replacement question (because the original question was read past its power mark). (In addition, in this hypothetical case, an interrupt penalty could not be earned on the replacement question because the first team had already given a response to the original question.)
Technical protests, such as an incorrect score, as well as protests that can be quickly resolved, may be handled by the staff in the affected game. Insofar as possible, the game must not be delayed because of protests. Similarly, while protests may be lodged during timeouts, protests will not be adjudicated until the end of the half, except in exceptional situations in which the moderator decides the problem can be quickly corrected within the 30-second timeout period.
- In the anomalous event that a tossup question is missing a power mark, its absence (or its argued effect on the game) is not protestable.
The tournament director may resolve a protest with or without a protest committee, depending upon the protest (e.g., one that simply requires verifying the correctness of an answer with a reference source). The tournament director’s decision is final. The tournament director may choose to convene a protest committee by selecting three or more tournament staff (which may include the tournament director) not involved with the game. The committee’s decision is final.
- If the tournament schedule and format allow, the tournament director may delay protest adjudication to have more time to research the issue. This may result in the teams playing subsequent matches (as per the schedule) and then being brought together to hear the final adjudication (and possibly engage in further play if the adjudication requires it).
- A tournament director may, but is not required to, make use of provisional gameplay (“hypothetical gameplay”) to determine whether a protest needs to be adjudicated. Provisional gameplay is gameplay performed on the assumption that a protest is upheld to see whether adjudication would affect the winner of the game.
- Ethics and Conduct
- All players, coaches, institutional representatives, and other persons associated with a team are bound by an honor code to behave responsibly and ethically. This includes, but is not limited to: treating all other participants and staff with courtesy, neither giving nor receiving impermissible assistance, not creating the temptation for another to cheat, abiding by all decisions of the tournament staff, not colluding with another person to “fix” a match result, not intentionally “throwing” a match, honestly reporting details of game situations to tournament officials, and promptly reporting violations of this honor code to a tournament staff member.
- Active players may not consult reference materials or make use of communication devices (such as phones or computers) during gameplay. Half-time, timeouts, and any post-game period during which protests are discussed and adjudicated are not considered “during gameplay.” This restriction does not apply to coaches and inactive players.
- Any tournament official may find that a player, coach, institutional representative, or other person associated with a team during the tournament has committed misconduct. Misconduct includes disruptive behavior, unethical behavior, any violation of the honor code, or other unsporting conduct. Officials may interpret these categories broadly. Teams are responsible for the conduct of all persons associated with that team.
- All instances of misconduct must be reported to the tournament director at the conclusion of the game, or as soon as practical.
- Instances of misconduct may result in sanctions to be determined by the tournament director. These sanctions include, but are not limited to, suspension of a participant from one or more matches, loss of game(s) for a team, score or clock adjustment, or expulsion of an entire team from the tournament.
- Unless the tournament director decides otherwise, other staff may not impose sanctions, except that a moderator must eject from a game any person found to have committed misconduct a second time during that game (i.e., a tournament director may give the staff greater powers to sanction than this minimum.) A player ejected from a game may not be replaced during that game.
For official NAQT events, the tournament director must, following the tournament, report all instances of misconduct to NAQT. These instances, as well as instances of misconduct occurring outside the tournament site, may result in sanctions to be determined by NAQT.
- Sanctions are not appealable.