Invitational Series #176A-AS

Only tournaments with individual statistics that used NAQT scoring rules are shown. If a tournament/division used multiple packet sets or portions of multiple packet sets, its results will be shown for each packet set.
Team	Tournament	Rank	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Hong Kong International A	Hong Kong Invitational	1/6	8–0	100.0%	2625	160	21	74	10	17.05	328.12
Dulwich Singapore	Kuala Lumpur Fall Invitational	1/6	7–0	100.0%	2035	140	13	68	8	14.81	290.71
Ruamrudee C	Bangkok Invitational	1/4	7–0	100.0%	1950	140	20	49	10	17.54	278.57
Kuala Lumpur International A	Kuala Lumpur Fall Invitational	2/6	5–2	71.4%	1915	140	16	54	12	17.07	273.57
Korea International A	Hong Kong Invitational	2/6	5–4	55.6%	2150	180	13	68	17	16.79	238.89
Garden	Kuala Lumpur Fall Invitational	3/6	5–3	62.5%	1910	160	18	57	5	14.60	238.75
Hong Kong International B	Hong Kong Invitational	3/6	6–2	75.0%	1670	160	15	55	19	14.14	208.75
Kuala Lumpur International B	Kuala Lumpur Fall Invitational	5/6	3–5	37.5%	1660	160	8	59	8	14.78	207.50
Ruamrudee B	Bangkok Invitational	3/4	2–5	28.6%	1150	140	7	39	5	14.78	164.29
Ruamrudee A	Bangkok Invitational	2/4	3–4	42.9%	1095	140	5	41	6	13.91	156.43
Korea International B	Hong Kong Invitational	4/6	3–6	33.3%	1250	180	9	43	15	14.62	138.89
Harrow Hong Kong A	Hong Kong Invitational	5/6	1–7	12.5%	1080	160	10	39	12	12.24	135.00
Berkeley Bangkok	Bangkok Invitational	4/4	2–5	28.6%	905	140	3	41	10	11.36	129.29
Harrow Hong Kong B	Hong Kong Invitational	5/6	2–6	25.0%	850	160	5	38	9	10.23	106.25
Penang Uplands	Kuala Lumpur Fall Invitational	5/6	0–7	0.0%	740	140	5	28	8	12.88	105.71
Kuala Lumpur International C	Kuala Lumpur Fall Invitational	3/6	2–5	28.6%	730	140	4	33	4	9.73	104.29

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.