2003 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I)
UC Berkeley A
| School: | University of California-Berkeley (Berkeley, CA) |
|---|---|
| Team: | UC Berkeley A |
| Division: | Division I |
| Date: | Friday, April 4, 2003 – Saturday, April 5, 2003 |
| Location: | University of California-Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA) |
Results
- Overall: Second place (of 32)
- Undergraduate: Ineligible
Players
| Player | GP | TUH | P | TU | I | P% | PP20TUH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Farris | 14 | 376 | 15 | 40 | 13 | 27.3% | 29.79 |
| Jeff Hoppes | 14 | 376 | 21 | 44 | 14 | 32.3% | 36.44 |
| Nicholas Meyer | 14 | 376 | 8 | 36 | 6 | 18.2% | 23.94 |
| Jon Pennington | 14 | 376 | 10 | 27 | 8 | 27.0% | 20.21 |
Games
| Round | Result | Score | P | TU | I | B | PPB | TUH | Opponent | P | TU | I | B | PPB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Win | 725 – 75 | 6 | 16 | 2 | 485 | 22.05 | 27 | Yale B | 1 | 3 | 0 | 30 | 7.50 |
| 2 | Win | 365 – 270 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 220 | 15.71 | 27 | Princeton | 1 | 8 | 1 | 180 | 20.00 |
| 3 | Win | 405 – 240 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 275 | 19.64 | 25 | Cornell | 1 | 7 | 1 | 160 | 20.00 |
| 4 | Win | 430 – 210 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 270 | 19.29 | 26 | Maryland | 1 | 8 | 1 | 120 | 13.33 |
| 5 | Win | 515 – 195 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 345 | 21.56 | 25 | Michigan B | 3 | 5 | 2 | 110 | 13.75 |
| 6 | Win | 505 – 65 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 340 | 20.00 | 27 | Wisconsin | 0 | 3 | 3 | 50 | 16.67 |
| 7 | Loss | 240 – 530 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 135 | 13.50 | 28 | Chicago | 8 | 9 | 4 | 340 | 20.00 |
| 8 | Win | 415 – 300 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 295 | 22.69 | 27 | Yale A | 4 | 5 | 2 | 200 | 22.22 |
| 9 | Win | 495 – 265 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 330 | 23.57 | 28 | Michigan A | 3 | 7 | 1 | 155 | 15.50 |
| 10 | Win | 440 – 200 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 285 | 19.00 | 28 | Florida | 2 | 6 | 7 | 145 | 18.12 |
| 11 | Win | 380 – 230 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 270 | 20.77 | 25 | Stanford A | 1 | 8 | 1 | 140 | 15.56 |
| 13 | Win | 495 – 140 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 350 | 23.33 | 27 | UC Berkeley C | 1 | 7 | 3 | 70 | 8.75 |
| 14 | Win | 510 – 255 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 345 | 23.00 | 28 | Michigan B | 4 | 5 | 3 | 160 | 17.78 |
| 15 | Loss | 310 – 625 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 210 | 23.33 | 28 | Chicago | 6 | 12 | 2 | 425 | 23.61 |
| 16 | Loss | 225 – 605 | n/a | ? | Chicago | n/a | n/a |