NAQT Canada Sectional (Region 2)

Date:	Saturday, February 6, 2010
Host:	McMaster University (Hamilton, ON, Canada)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT

Division I: SCT-10

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2010 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Toronto A	9–0	100.0%	3320	182	25	97	25	17.65	364.84
2	Michigan A	8–1	88.9%	2800	183	17	89	27	16.89	306.01
3	McMaster A	5–4	55.6%	1685	186	14	68	23	11.10	181.18
3	Western Ontario	5–4	55.6%	1500	176	8	66	6	10.14	170.45
5	Toronto B	4–5	44.4%	1145	186	10	56	35	9.24	123.12
6	U of Rochester	5–4	55.6%	1490	184	8	66	12	10.41	161.96
6	Case Western	4–5	44.4%	1570	182	11	66	11	10.39	172.53
8	Guelph A	4–5	44.4%	1415	186	8	61	9	10.58	152.15
9	Ottawa A	1–8	11.1%	680	196	2	42	8	6.14	69.39
10	RIT	0–9	0.0%	485	191	5	30	8	4.29	50.79

Division II: SCT-10DII (shares with SCT-10)

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2010 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Ottawa B	7–2	77.8%	2880	176	19	88	9	16.45	327.27
2	Waterloo A	8–1	88.9%	3285	185	27	86	18	18.67	355.14
3	Michigan B	7–2	77.8%	3010	187	31	76	25	17.85	321.93
4	McMaster B	7–2	77.8%	2180	184	9	78	15	15.40	236.96
5	Toronto C	6–3	66.7%	2040	186	13	74	19	13.79	219.35
6	Waterloo B	4–5	44.4%	750	178	1	46	9	6.81	84.27
7	Guelph B	3–6	33.3%	1100	178	3	57	11	9.00	123.60
8	Ottawa C	2–7	22.2%	760	186	4	33	4	10.54	81.72
9	Michigan C	1–8	11.1%	715	191	2	43	5	6.22	74.87
10	Guelph C	0–9	0.0%	730	179	3	39	7	7.86	81.56

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.