NAQT Region 5 Sectional (Region 5)

Date:	Saturday, February 9, 2013
Host:	The University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT

Division I: SCT-13

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2013 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).
#	UG	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1		Georgia Tech	12–0	100.0%	6370	269	73	121	35	21.86	473.61
2		Alabama A	10–2	83.3%	5780	269	67	112	33	21.34	429.74
3	1	South Carolina A	7–5	58.3%	2170	259	12	83	18	13.16	167.57
4	2	Louisville A	5–7	41.7%	2265	261	11	88	26	13.64	173.56
4		Virginia Tech A	5–7	41.7%	2195	259	10	86	21	13.44	169.50
6	3	Alabama B	2–10	16.7%	1390	254	4	63	14	11.49	109.45
7	4	Louisville B	1–11	8.3%	1485	259	11	60	28	12.11	114.67

Division II: SCT-13DII (shares with SCT-13)

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2013 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	North Carolina	6–0	100.0%	2550	115	38	35	16	23.42	443.48
2	Centre A	6–0	100.0%	2645	120	27	55	8	21.10	440.83
2	Auburn A	6–0	100.0%	1985	109	16	49	13	20.31	364.22
4	Western Kentucky	5–1	83.3%	1955	113	16	49	9	19.54	346.02
5	Louisville C	5–1	83.3%	2080	119	24	43	16	20.45	349.58
5	Davidson B	4–2	66.7%	1480	106	18	30	8	19.79	279.25
7	Kentucky	5–1	83.3%	1635	118	9	53	16	16.94	277.12
8	Liberty A	4–2	66.7%	1585	116	11	48	6	16.44	273.28
9	Alabama C	3–3	50.0%	1330	117	13	41	11	14.44	227.35
10	Centre B	2–4	33.3%	1075	118	5	41	8	13.70	182.20
10	South Carolina B	2–4	33.3%	995	118	6	36	11	14.29	168.64
12	Roanoke	3–3	50.0%	1035	112	10	35	5	12.44	184.82
12	High Point	3–3	50.0%	1000	123	8	34	8	13.81	162.60
12	Virginia Tech B	2–4	33.3%	1245	114	17	35	12	13.46	218.42
12	Liberty B	2–4	33.3%	935	113	7	32	3	13.46	165.49
16	North Greenville A	2–4	33.3%	855	113	11	28	8	11.54	151.33
17	College of Charleston	1–5	16.7%	815	107	9	27	6	12.22	152.34
17	Davidson A	1–5	16.7%	785	125	8	25	3	13.03	125.60
19	Virginia Tech C	1–5	16.7%	520	120	3	22	9	12.00	86.67
20	Auburn B	0–6	0.0%	460	121	3	25	7	7.14	76.03
21	North Greenville B	0–6	0.0%	145	111	0	13	13	6.15	26.13

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.