NAQT logo
Search Toggle menu

NAQT Great Lakes Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 4, 2017
Host: Youngstown State University (Youngstown, OH)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I: SCT-17

# UG TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A Michigan A9–0100.0%475019358 82 2022.57492.23
2A Michigan B7–277.8%360518435 80 1620.52391.85
3A Ohio State A8–188.9%378519934 90 2520.16380.40
4 Penn State A6–366.7%237018621 74 2114.95254.84
5 1B Kenyon A5–455.6%217518112 76 514.32240.33
6 2 Pittsburgh A4–544.4%20251858 73 514.81218.92
7 3 Michigan State A3–633.3%16251857 68 2612.93175.68
8 4 Penn State B1–811.1%8901847 38 1110.2296.74
9 5 Carnegie Mellon A1–811.1%8251848 34 99.7689.67
10 6 Wright State1–811.1%8901757 43 98.00101.71

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2017 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2017 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II: SCT-17DII (shares with SCT-17)

Jump to Division I
# TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Ohio State B11–191.7%429520647 88 2821.11416.99
2 Michigan C11–191.7%348020239 68 2721.96344.55
3 Carnegie Mellon B9–375.0%312522036 73 3118.96284.09
4 Penn State C8–466.7%303020317 84 1519.90298.52
4 Michigan State B8–466.7%266520424 72 1717.40261.27
4 Ohio State C8–466.7%232019914 74 1016.14233.17
7 Case Western A7–558.3%277520924 74 1918.06265.55
8 Pittsburgh C5–741.7%185020313 61 714.59182.27
9 Kenyon B4–833.3%169519911 53 215.78170.35
10 Carnegie Mellon C3–925.0%180019313 62 1714.27186.53
10 Pittsburgh B3–925.0%165020216 51 2014.93163.37
12 Edinboro1–118.3%128020015 44 911.19128.00
Case Western B0–120.0%       

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2017 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read