NAQT North Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 8, 2020
Location: University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (Minneapolis, MN)
Sponsor: Play Quiz Bowl (MN)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Players are ranked by their PP20TUH (points per 20 tossups heard) in the preliminary rounds of the tournament. Ties are broken by their power percentage (P%).

Division I (SCT-20) Jump to Division II

# Player Year Team GP TUH P TU I P% PP20TUH
1 Shan KothariGrad.Minnesota A 12.0 264 26 54 12 32.5% 65.91
2 Jakob BoeyeSo.Carleton College A 12.0 264 10 73 6 12.0% 64.39
3 Samuel Martin BaileyGrad.Minnesota A 12.0 264 8 40 7 16.7% 36.74
4 Colin WhislerGrad.Wisconsin A 12.0 264 4 40 5 9.1% 32.95
5 Janet WangSr.Minnesota B 12.0 264 6 32 1 15.8% 30.68
6 Brian KalathiveetilSr.Minnesota A 12.0 264 7 33 9 17.5% 29.55
7 Ben KoppelSr.Carleton College A 12.0 264 7 23 8 23.3% 22.35
8 B. J. RyanSr.Carleton College A 12.0 264 8 19 4 29.6% 21.97
9 Carter RisloveJr.Minnesota B 11.0 242 1 21 7 4.5% 15.70
10 Nibir SarmaSo.Minnesota B 7.0 154 2 14 10 12.5% 15.58
11 Arun BalakrishnaJr.Minnesota B 12.0 264 2 16 8 11.1% 11.36
12 Blake AndertJr.Minnesota A 12.0 264 1 8 1 11.1% 6.82
13 Venkat LakshmananGrad.Wisconsin A 12.0 264 1 8 4 11.1% 5.68

Division II (SCT-20DII) Jump to Division I

# Player Year Team GP TUH P TU I P% PP20TUH
1 Andrew StelzerJr.Lawrence A 11.0 242 24 80 11 23.1% 91.32
2 Jakob LippertSo.Northern Michigan A 11.0 242 27 70 10 27.8% 87.19
3 Isaiah GutmanFr.Grinnell 11.0 242 20 59 12 25.3% 68.60
4 Tora HusarSo.Minnesota C 11.0 242 25 33 14 43.1% 52.48
5 Innes MaxwellSr.Lawrence B 11.0 242 7 54 5 11.5% 51.24
6 Joe KammannSo.Minnesota C 11.0 242 24 29 13 45.3% 48.35
7 Davis Everson-RoseSo.Minnesota C 11.0 242 24 29 14 45.3% 47.93
8 Carter MongFr.Minnesota D 9.0 198 3 33 5 8.3% 35.35
9 Nick ParkerFr.Grinnell 11.0 231 18 13 13 58.1% 29.00
10 Cole SchlottmanFr.Minnesota D 10.0 209 7 25 12 21.9% 28.23
11 Mike LeiterSo.Minnesota E 11.0 242 7 25 7 21.9% 26.45
11 Brett MattsonSr.Northern Michigan B 11.0 242 5 27 5 15.6% 26.45
13 Henry SandersFr.Grinnell 11.0 242 8 23 9 25.8% 25.21
14 Shubham SinghSo.Minnesota E 11.0 242 11 18 9 37.9% 24.79
15 Andrew SemakJr.Northern Michigan B 11.0 242 4 27 7 12.9% 24.38
15 Sam HikenFr.Carleton College B 11.0 242 3 25 0 10.7% 24.38
17 Ken BrungerJr.Northern Michigan C 11.0 242 2 28 6 6.7% 23.14
18 Peyton JohnsonFr.Minnesota E 11.0 242 10 14 4 41.7% 22.31
18 Ryan SamFr.Wisconsin B 11.0 242 3 26 7 10.3% 22.31
20 Will HuangSo.Wisconsin B 11.0 242 6 18 1 25.0% 21.90
21 Ella UrenSo.Northern Michigan A 11.0 242 1 24 2 4.0% 20.25
22 Andrew LienSo.Wisconsin B 11.0 242 3 21 5 12.5% 19.01
23 Lucas PhamSo.Minnesota E 11.0 242 2 20 2 9.1% 18.18
24 Andrius Adomavicius?Minnesota D 9.0 198 3 13 0 18.8% 17.68
25 Bjorn Hotley?Carleton College B 11.0 242 3 16 2 15.8% 16.12
26 Deleena SimonSo.Northern Michigan B 11.0 242 6 11 2 35.3% 15.70
27 Willem VilleriusFr.Lawrence A 11.0 242 1 17 4 5.6% 13.64
28 Joe SturmSo.Northern Michigan B 11.0 242 3 14 5 17.6% 13.22
28 Connor JansenFr.Carleton College B 11.0 242 2 15 4 11.8% 13.22
30 Thomas GrindleFr.Grinnell 11.0 132 4 4 3 50.0% 12.88
31 Aksel WennerSo.Minnesota D 9.0 187 3 7 3 30.0% 10.70
32 Kaity SchillFr.Northern Michigan C 11.0 242 3 9 2 25.0% 10.33
33 Mackenzie PiersonSo.Northern Michigan A 11.0 242 2 10 3 16.7% 9.50
34 Charlie OertelSo.Lawrence B 11.0 242 3 4 0 42.9% 7.02
34 Rayna SherbinowJr.Northern Michigan C 11.0 242 1 9 4 10.0% 7.02
36 Eric PitzSr.Northern Michigan A 11.0 242 1 7 1 12.5% 6.61
37 Ellie ValotSo.Northern Michigan D 10.0 220 0 7 0 0.0% 6.36
38 Ilah WilsonFr.Northern Michigan D 8.0 176 1 6 5 14.3% 5.68
39 Elias SabaFr.Grinnell 11.0 121 0 3 0 0.0% 4.96
40 Erin MortimerSo.Northern Michigan D 9.0 198 1 3 0 25.0% 4.55
41 Kelvin LienSo.Wisconsin B 11.0 242 0 5 0 0.0% 4.13
42 Maddie GuestFr.Lawrence A 11.0 242 2 1 1 66.7% 2.89
43 Charlie ArnoldSr.Northern Michigan C 11.0 242 0 4 2 0.0% 2.48
44 Bailey GomesFr.Northern Michigan D 8.0 176 0 2 0 0.0% 2.27
45 Morgan ThomasFr.Northern Michigan D 8.0 176 0 2 1 0.0% 1.70
46 Owen YoungSr.Minnesota C 11.0 242 1 1 1 50.0% 1.65
47 Sanjana ArjiFr.Minnesota D 9.0 176 0 1 0 0.0% 1.14

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read