2001 NAQT Michigan State Championship

Date: Saturday, March 10, 2001
Host: University of Michigan-Ann Arbor (Ann Arbor, MI)
Scoring Rules: NAQT
Questions: IS-24
# TeamW–L%PointsPPG
1 Detroit Country Day A8–188.9%3220357.78
2 Detroit Catholic Central A9–0100.0%4435492.78
3 Eisenhower9–0100.0%4585509.44
3 Hartland A7–277.8%2325258.33
5 Livonia Churchill9–0100.0%3995443.89
5 Plymouth9–0100.0%3975441.67
5 Hancock8–188.9%2945327.22
5 Troy A8–188.9%2850316.67
9 Kent City7–277.8%2450272.22
9 Trenton7–277.8%2140237.78
9 Lansing Catholic A7–277.8%2135237.22
9 Detroit Catholic Central B6–366.7%2620291.11
9 Lahser6–366.7%2145238.33
9 Farmington6–366.7%1960217.78
9 Seaholm6–366.7%1895210.56
9 Waterford Kettering6–366.7%1890210.00
17 Haslett6–366.7%2125236.11
18 Detroit Country Day B6–366.7%1730192.22
19 Team Michigan4–544.4%1760195.56
20 Grand Rapids City4–544.4%1675186.11
21 Ovid-Elsie4–544.4%1455161.67
22 Hartland B4–544.4%1315146.11
23 Lumen Christi4–544.4%985109.44
24 Detroit Catholic Central C3–633.3%1305145.00
25 Centreville3–633.3%1245138.33
26 Harper Woods Notre Dame3–633.3%1140126.67
27 Lansing Catholic B3–633.3%1010112.22
28 Portland3–633.3%88598.33
29 Troy B2–722.2%1380153.33
30 Grandville2–722.2%1015112.78
31 Houghton A2–722.2%920102.22
32 Houghton B2–722.2%86095.56
33 Woodhaven1–811.1%960106.67
34 New Buffalo1–811.1%77586.11
35 Washtenaw Technical1–811.1%69577.22
36 Westland John Glenn1–811.1%65572.78
37 Crestwood1–811.1%63570.56
38 Immaculate Conception A1–811.1%56562.78
39 Immaculate Conception B1–811.1%45550.56
40 Vandercook Lake0–90.0%31535.00

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read