Sumner County Invitational

Date:	Saturday, February 4, 2023
Host:	Gallatin High School (Gallatin, TN)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT
Questions:	IS-218A

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2023 Small School National Championship Tournament (Open Division).
The highlighted teams marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2023 High School National Championship Tournament.
The highlighted team marked with ‘C’ qualified for the 2023 Small School National Championship Tournament (Traditional Public Schools Division).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1^A^B	University School of Nashville A	9–0	100.0%	4290	180	66	60	24	22.38	476.67
2^B	Hume-Fogg A	8–1	88.9%	4180	180	61	59	21	23.17	464.44
3^A^B	University School of Nashville B	5–4	55.6%	2385	180	24	59	9	17.83	265.00
4^A^B	Merrol Hyde	6–3	66.7%	3075	180	35	62	12	20.52	341.67
5	Gallatin	8–1	88.9%	2945	180	17	89	10	17.45	327.22
6	Cookeville B	6–3	66.7%	2480	180	23	64	11	17.82	275.56
7	Cookeville A	7–2	77.8%	3155	180	27	82	18	18.53	350.56
8	Mount Juliet A	5–4	55.6%	1985	180	25	56	40	15.43	220.56
9	Battle Ground A	8–1	88.9%	2810	180	15	84	11	18.18	312.22
10	Cookeville C	4–5	44.4%	1925	180	12	59	5	16.62	213.89
11	Hume-Fogg B	4–5	44.4%	2130	180	20	61	16	16.05	236.67
12	Cookeville D	4–5	44.4%	1640	180	16	52	10	13.68	182.22
13	Adair County (Columbia, Kentucky)	4–5	44.4%	1760	180	14	64	8	12.18	195.56
14	Portland A	4–5	44.4%	1595	180	11	53	12	15.00	177.22
15	Franklin-Simpson (Kentucky)	3–5	37.5%	1040	160	1	48	5	11.63	130.00
15	Cookeville E	3–5	37.5%	960	160	5	42	9	10.85	120.00
17	Brentwood	5–3	62.5%	1685	160	17	47	10	15.78	210.62
18	Battle Ground B	4–4	50.0%	1355	160	7	46	16	16.42	169.38
19	Franklin Road	2–6	25.0%	1135	160	12	42	23	12.04	141.88
20^C	York Institute	3–5	37.5%	1250	160	8	46	6	12.96	156.25
21	Ezell-Harding A	2–6	25.0%	510	160	4	22	4	9.62	63.75
22	Clarksville	2–6	25.0%	1075	160	7	47	12	10.37	134.38
23	Mount Juliet B	2–5	28.6%	640	140	2	30	2	10.00	91.43
24	DeKalb County	1–6	14.3%	745	140	5	31	8	11.11	106.43
25	Ezell-Harding B	1–6	14.3%	450	140	0	27	4	7.41	64.29
26	Beech	0–7	0.0%	485	140	0	26	3	9.23	69.29
	Hendersonville + Ellis	4–4	50.0%	1265	160	8	51	11	11.69	158.12
	Portland + Rucker-Stewart	3–5	37.5%	990	160	5	45	7	10.00	123.75

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.