2004 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date:	Friday, April 2, 2004 – Saturday, April 3, 2004
Location:	Washington University in St. Louis (St. Louis, MO)

Division I Pool 1

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
UC Berkeley	13–0	100.0%	6525	329	56	166	25	18.69	396.66
Florida	12–1	92.3%	4425	311	27	135	37	17.62	284.57
Michigan A	11–2	84.6%	5010	326	43	131	50	18.99	307.36
Yale	9–4	69.2%	3790	308	20	129	36	15.97	246.10
Maryland	9–4	69.2%	3630	319	17	123	30	16.39	227.59
Illinois	8–5	61.5%	4400	324	58	109	21	15.24	271.60
U of Rochester	6–7	46.2%	2940	316	15	107	21	14.34	186.08
Harvard	6–7	46.2%	2725	328	20	103	43	13.09	166.16

Pool 2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Emory	10–3	76.9%	3475	301	9	135	22	14.58	230.90
Indiana	9–4	69.2%	3815	304	18	129	18	15.95	250.99
South Florida A	9–4	69.2%	3045	310	7	128	22	13.11	196.45
Stanford	8–5	61.5%	3420	291	13	124	17	15.11	235.05
Michigan B	8–5	61.5%	3090	316	11	120	31	14.35	195.57
Iowa State	7–6	53.8%	2375	314	11	103	27	11.54	151.27
Arkansas	6–7	46.2%	2475	301	10	107	21	11.62	164.45
Caltech	4–9	30.8%	2020	309	20	83	41	10.63	130.74

Pool 3

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Chicago	7–6	53.8%	3070	302	20	113	28	13.38	203.31
Virginia	7–6	53.8%	2985	300	12	114	25	14.21	199.00
Carleton College	7–6	53.8%	2995	308	14	121	19	12.37	194.48
Swarthmore	5–8	38.5%	2650	320	16	101	14	12.67	165.62
Rutgers	5–8	38.5%	2365	305	8	97	4	12.45	155.08
Columbia	5–8	38.5%	2345	313	11	94	28	13.27	149.84
Michigan C	5–8	38.5%	1870	295	10	84	23	10.59	126.78
Pittsburgh	4–9	30.8%	2100	305	8	92	15	11.35	137.70

Pool 4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
South Florida B	7–6	53.8%	2140	323	5	105	15	9.91	132.51
Texas A&M	6–7	46.2%	1940	317	9	90	40	11.16	122.40
Truman State	4–9	30.8%	1665	314	14	72	29	10.23	106.05
Northwestern	3–10	23.1%	1660	315	9	80	30	9.83	105.40
Minnesota	3–10	23.1%	1645	315	11	78	29	9.49	104.44
Rice	2–11	15.4%	1830	322	8	94	22	8.63	113.66
Missouri	2–11	15.4%	1315	331	5	68	20	9.04	79.46
Brandeis	1–12	7.7%	1340	322	5	75	29	8.25	83.23

Division II Pool 1/2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
UCLA	12–1	92.3%	4190	285	18	139	34	17.20	294.04
Illinois	11–2	84.6%	3210	289	13	119	21	14.62	222.15
Harvard	11–2	84.6%	2835	296	7	115	26	14.02	191.55
Carleton College	10–3	76.9%	3270	289	13	124	22	14.20	226.30
Chicago	9–4	69.2%	2975	290	15	113	32	13.91	205.17
St. Thomas	8–5	61.5%	2850	280	11	108	22	14.41	203.57
Carnegie Mellon	6–7	46.2%	2580	290	11	107	34	12.84	177.93
Stanford	6–7	46.2%	2095	291	8	92	8	10.95	143.99

Pool 3/4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
UC Berkeley	10–3	76.9%	2715	274	6	110	10	13.58	198.18
Valencia	9–4	69.2%	2235	295	13	93	29	11.84	151.53
Maryland	8–5	61.5%	2165	291	6	101	20	10.89	148.80
Truman State	8–5	61.5%	2045	276	5	98	21	10.63	148.19
Georgia	7–6	53.8%	2415	291	5	114	26	11.18	165.98
Penn	7–6	53.8%	2350	286	8	100	26	12.59	164.34
Emory	6–7	46.2%	2095	292	7	94	14	11.09	143.49
Swarthmore	3–10	23.1%	1775	258	10	82	23	10.00	137.60

Pool 5/6

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
MIT	10–3	76.9%	2865	278	14	111	24	13.32	206.12
Virginia	6–7	46.2%	2310	294	4	105	24	12.11	157.14
Caltech	6–7	46.2%	2140	281	6	93	15	12.07	152.31
Kansas	6–7	46.2%	1890	286	6	95	28	9.80	132.17
Bevill-Jasper	6–7	46.2%	1775	278	3	88	17	10.27	127.70
Athens State	6–7	46.2%	1875	298	7	84	23	11.48	125.84
Pittsburgh	4–9	30.8%	1625	279	3	85	15	9.15	116.49
Palm Beach CC	2–11	15.4%	1045	302	4	59	15	7.46	69.21

Pool 7/8

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Columbia	6–7	46.2%	1735	271	7	82	24	10.45	128.04
DePauw	6–7	46.2%	1640	294	2	95	17	7.68	111.56
Georgetown College	6–7	46.2%	1335	291	10	74	35	7.56	91.75
Broward	5–8	38.5%	1975	296	5	99	13	9.38	133.45
South Georgia	5–8	38.5%	1275	291	3	70	6	7.67	87.63
Snead State	2–11	15.4%	725	276	1	45	10	6.74	52.54
Marion Military	1–12	7.7%	835	298	2	50	16	7.40	56.04
Hutchinson CC	0–13	0.0%	415	304	1	33	19	4.85	27.30

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read