2004 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, April 2, 2004 – Saturday, April 3, 2004 |
Location: |
Washington University in St. Louis (St. Louis, MO) |
Division I Pool 1
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
UC Berkeley | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3385 | 179 | 27 |
89 |
10 | 18.45 | 378.21 |
---|
Florida | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2130 | 173 | 16 |
62 |
17 | 17.37 | 246.24 |
---|
Michigan A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2450 | 177 | 24 |
62 |
22 | 18.37 | 276.84 |
---|
Illinois | 3–4 | 42.9% | 2040 | 175 | 27 |
54 |
12 | 14.26 | 233.14 |
---|
Maryland | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1840 | 175 | 12 |
54 |
16 | 18.18 | 210.29 |
---|
Yale | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1780 | 174 | 14 |
59 |
23 | 15.00 | 204.60 |
---|
U of Rochester | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1250 | 174 | 9 |
44 |
11 | 13.77 | 143.68 |
---|
Harvard | 0–7 | 0.0% | 1160 | 177 | 13 |
43 |
25 | 11.79 | 131.07 |
---|
Pool 2
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Indiana | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2010 | 166 | 9 |
71 |
9 | 15.12 | 242.17 |
---|
Stanford | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1935 | 161 | 7 |
68 |
12 | 16.13 | 240.37 |
---|
Emory | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1790 | 163 | 5 |
67 |
17 | 15.69 | 219.63 |
---|
Michigan B | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1610 | 166 | 2 |
66 |
14 | 14.56 | 193.98 |
---|
South Florida A | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1545 | 166 | 2 |
70 |
12 | 12.15 | 186.14 |
---|
Iowa State | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1360 | 164 | 5 |
60 |
11 | 11.38 | 165.85 |
---|
Arkansas | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1135 | 165 | 5 |
51 |
12 | 10.89 | 137.58 |
---|
Caltech | 0–7 | 0.0% | 880 | 161 | 10 |
35 |
19 | 10.56 | 109.32 |
---|
Division II Pool 1/2
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
UCLA | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2055 | 147 | 10 |
68 |
18 | 16.86 | 279.59 |
---|
Carleton College | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1795 | 155 | 8 |
66 |
11 | 14.46 | 231.61 |
---|
Illinois | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1690 | 160 | 7 |
65 |
13 | 13.89 | 211.25 |
---|
Harvard | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1380 | 156 | 4 |
55 |
13 | 14.15 | 176.92 |
---|
Chicago | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1450 | 155 | 10 |
58 |
16 | 11.76 | 187.10 |
---|
St. Thomas | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1385 | 160 | 9 |
49 |
14 | 14.31 | 173.12 |
---|
Carnegie Mellon | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1115 | 154 | 7 |
49 |
15 | 10.62 | 144.81 |
---|
Stanford | 1–6 | 14.3% | 910 | 159 | 5 |
38 |
5 | 11.16 | 114.47 |
---|
Pool 3/4
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
UC Berkeley | 6–1 | 85.7% | 1455 | 150 | 2 |
63 |
7 | 12.77 | 194.00 |
---|
Penn | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1200 | 153 | 3 |
51 |
12 | 13.06 | 156.86 |
---|
Georgia | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1170 | 154 | 5 |
54 |
12 | 10.42 | 151.95 |
---|
Valencia | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1135 | 158 | 7 |
45 |
16 | 12.69 | 143.67 |
---|
Truman State | 4–3 | 57.1% | 975 | 136 | 4 |
44 |
10 | 10.94 | 143.38 |
---|
Emory | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1115 | 152 | 6 |
47 |
11 | 11.51 | 146.71 |
---|
Maryland | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1110 | 156 | 4 |
49 |
9 | 11.42 | 142.31 |
---|
Swarthmore | 0–7 | 0.0% | 770 | 129 | 5 |
38 |
9 | 8.37 | 119.38 |
---|
Pool 5/6
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
MIT | 7–0 | 100.0% | 1780 | 147 | 11 |
67 |
11 | 12.82 | 242.18 |
---|
Bevill-Jasper | 5–2 | 71.4% | 1170 | 154 | 3 |
54 |
7 | 10.88 | 151.95 |
---|
Kansas | 4–3 | 57.1% | 995 | 150 | 5 |
48 |
11 | 9.34 | 132.67 |
---|
Virginia | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1230 | 152 | 2 |
55 |
11 | 12.37 | 161.84 |
---|
Caltech | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1165 | 149 | 5 |
52 |
8 | 10.70 | 156.38 |
---|
Athens State | 3–4 | 42.9% | 980 | 158 | 4 |
43 |
12 | 11.70 | 124.05 |
---|
Pittsburgh | 2–5 | 28.6% | 835 | 151 | 2 |
42 |
8 | 9.66 | 110.60 |
---|
Palm Beach CC | 1–6 | 14.3% | 460 | 159 | 3 |
28 |
9 | 5.81 | 57.86 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read