Sectional Championship

Date: Friday, February 10, 2006
Host: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Urbana-Champaign, IL)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-06)

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Chicago A12–192.3%588032557 125 3221.62361.85
2 Michigan A10–376.9%530533054 127 4319.01321.52
3 Chicago B8–466.7%374029235 109 3816.08256.16
4 Truman State5–741.7%230529923 78 1812.57154.18
5 WUSTL4–833.3%246029824 85 3413.03165.10
6 Chicago C3–925.0%207029916 78 2712.61138.46
7 Rose-Hulman1–118.3%19502859 84 1611.34136.84

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2006 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DI).

Division II (SCT-06DII)

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Michigan A11–0100.0%431023130 120 1518.23373.16
2 DePauw9–281.8%257522917 81 1416.12224.89
3 Chicago8–372.7%347523035 84 3119.03302.17
4 Illinois7–463.6%296024020 90 4418.00246.67
4 WUSTL A7–463.6%268022937 111 418.24234.06
4 Northwestern7–463.6%279023919 91 1415.14233.47
7 Cincinnati A6–554.5%207521912 76 2814.49189.50
8 Truman State B4–736.4%196022719 57 1415.46172.69
9 Truman State A7–463.6%259021316 88 714.47243.19
10 WUSTL B6–554.5%15102192 20 410.91137.90
11 Eureka College4–736.4%141523113 55 1811.34122.51
12 Michigan B3–827.3%14152165 63 1811.76131.02
12 Bowling Green3–827.3%12952494 56 2213.08104.02
12 Bradley3–827.3%104021111 44 2810.4598.58
15 Cincinnati B2–918.2%106521912 47 97.8097.26
16 Cincinnati C1–109.1%7752285 45 257.5067.98

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2006 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DII).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read