Sectional Championship

Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009
Host: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-09) Jump to Division II

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Brown A14–0100.0%682033584 128 4921.34407.16
2 Harvard B11–378.6%483031847 121 3218.30303.77
3 Harvard A9–564.3%430031734 124 3517.25271.29
3 Dartmouth A9–564.3%435032130 130 3217.25271.03
5 Princeton A10–471.4%395530020 137 3115.54263.67
6 Harvard C7–750.0%398032035 116 3216.26248.75
7 Dartmouth B6–842.9%327031114 122 1814.19210.29
8 Brandeis A5–935.7%268530323 100 2211.79177.23
9 Yale A5–935.7%231532014 98 4612.10144.69
10 Rutgers4–1028.6%21803046 98 1011.15143.42
11 Harvard D4–1028.6%19153038 91 2610.25126.40
12 NYU A0–140.0%12553064 65 209.3582.03

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2009 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

Division II (SCT-09DII) Jump to Division I

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Yale B12–285.7%470029527 134 4819.97318.64
2 RPI12–285.7%494030627 149 1417.70322.88
3 Yale C10–471.4%410530026 114 2319.21273.67
3 Princeton B10–471.4%420030830 121 5018.72272.73
5 CUNY-Hunter8–657.1%402531032 122 4316.49259.68
6 NYU B7–750.0%343529130 105 3115.48236.08
6 Columbia B7–750.0%288529613 103 2315.30194.93
8 Tufts B3–1121.4%206529712 83 1411.84139.06
9 Columbia A9–564.3%397529818 139 3015.70266.78
10 Brown B8–657.1%24952886 105 1612.93173.26
11 Dartmouth C6–842.9%24102799 97 2513.49172.76
11 Harvard E6–842.9%219027317 81 3213.11160.44
11 Tufts A6–842.9%207031513 91 2510.48131.43
14 Brandeis B5–935.7%188527213 76 1411.24138.60
15 UConn3–1121.4%19253006 93 1810.05128.33
16 West Point0–140.0%3352361 25 175.9628.39

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2009 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read