2010 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date:	Friday, April 9, 2010 – Saturday, April 10, 2010
Location:	Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL)

Division I Pool 1

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Chicago A	11–2	84.6%	5310	306	56	123	27	18.85	347.06
Harvard	11–2	84.6%	4990	309	54	122	27	17.59	322.98
Penn	11–2	84.6%	3995	306	39	117	37	15.54	261.11
Minnesota A	10–3	76.9%	5070	309	48	129	23	17.94	328.16
Illinois A	10–3	76.9%	4920	307	44	136	33	17.03	320.52
Toronto	9–4	69.2%	3500	315	23	116	33	15.54	222.22
Brown	8–5	61.5%	4065	306	28	129	39	16.24	265.69
Florida	5–8	38.5%	2865	302	23	99	28	13.69	189.74

Pool 2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Maryland	10–3	76.9%	3280	288	22	126	56	13.31	227.78
Michigan	10–3	76.9%	2920	282	14	116	32	13.15	207.09
UC Irvine	7–6	53.8%	3180	283	15	119	19	13.88	224.73
Carleton College	7–6	53.8%	3160	291	13	120	15	13.83	217.18
Yale	7–6	53.8%	3210	297	15	119	31	14.55	216.16
VCU	7–6	53.8%	2805	294	14	122	25	11.03	190.82
Chicago B	6–7	46.2%	3175	295	31	104	28	13.41	215.25
Minnesota B	5–8	38.5%	1900	295	14	82	16	9.90	128.81

Pool 3

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Florida State	7–6	53.8%	2530	290	17	102	23	11.51	174.48
Missouri	7–6	53.8%	2160	298	4	115	30	9.24	144.97
Lawrence	6–7	46.2%	2040	283	8	93	12	10.40	144.17
Dartmouth	5–8	38.5%	2480	302	6	105	16	12.79	164.24
RPI	5–8	38.5%	2175	281	5	99	10	11.15	154.80
Stanford	5–8	38.5%	2145	297	13	93	8	10.00	144.44
WUSTL	5–8	38.5%	1415	291	7	83	28	6.89	97.25
Oxford	4–9	30.8%	1990	289	12	84	25	11.41	137.72

Pool 4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Arizona State	7–6	53.8%	2300	292	13	105	25	10.00	157.53
Chicago C	6–7	46.2%	2285	280	14	94	17	11.30	163.21
Illinois B	6–7	46.2%	1845	289	7	93	18	9.00	127.68
McMaster B	4–9	30.8%	1465	291	4	82	23	8.14	100.69
Alabama	2–11	15.4%	1555	294	8	72	7	9.38	105.78
McMaster A	2–11	15.4%	1455	290	7	76	32	9.04	100.34
UCLA	2–11	15.4%	1365	304	6	74	19	7.88	89.80
Manchester	1–12	7.7%	1230	298	10	58	22	8.97	82.55

Division II Pool 1/2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Rice	11–0	100.0%	4610	247	29	125	21	19.68	373.28
Clemson	11–0	100.0%	4655	259	40	117	47	19.87	359.46
Brown	10–1	90.9%	5965	262	62	119	35	22.21	455.34
Chicago A	9–2	81.8%	3355	263	27	100	20	16.14	255.13
Michigan	8–3	72.7%	3160	257	32	89	24	15.79	245.91
Harvard	7–4	63.6%	3120	250	21	95	49	18.10	249.60
William & Mary	6–5	54.5%	3120	263	22	104	30	15.08	237.26
Louisville	5–6	45.5%	2375	262	18	93	27	11.80	181.30

Pool 3/4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Princeton	7–4	63.6%	3435	256	23	100	19	17.76	268.36
Carleton College	7–4	63.6%	3160	262	26	96	32	16.15	241.22
Cornell	7–4	63.6%	2890	259	16	103	24	14.62	223.17
Caltech	6–5	54.5%	2925	251	12	102	19	15.96	233.07
St. Charles CC	6–5	54.5%	2440	248	13	99	20	12.10	196.77
Ottawa	6–5	54.5%	2555	260	22	88	13	12.82	196.54
Northeast Alabama CC	6–5	54.5%	2180	258	7	98	27	11.71	168.99
Chipola	5–6	45.5%	2670	242	14	106	26	12.75	220.66

Pool 5/6

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Alabama	6–5	54.5%	2595	264	19	91	15	13.41	196.59
Centre	6–5	54.5%	2265	256	4	103	18	11.82	176.95
Notre Dame	5–6	45.5%	2370	254	14	91	27	13.19	186.61
Maryland	5–6	45.5%	2130	255	9	91	25	12.10	167.06
Valencia A	5–6	45.5%	2080	255	15	86	41	11.88	163.14
Stanford	4–7	36.4%	2010	255	7	88	19	11.79	157.65
Arizona State	4–7	36.4%	1665	240	12	71	19	10.48	138.75
Truman State	2–9	18.2%	1715	244	9	67	30	13.95	140.57

Pool 7/8

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Wisconsin	6–5	54.5%	2210	232	7	88	15	13.68	190.52
Michigan State	4–7	36.4%	2270	263	10	94	16	12.12	172.62
Snead State	4–7	36.4%	1680	247	3	92	19	8.53	136.03
Washington	4–7	36.4%	1570	252	4	80	14	9.29	124.60
Seminole CC	2–9	18.2%	1280	252	5	68	15	8.22	101.59
Illinois	1–10	9.1%	1145	240	5	65	25	7.79	95.42
Chicago B	1–10	9.1%	1160	247	5	55	1	9.00	93.93
Valencia B	0–11	0.0%	660	257	5	40	8	5.00	51.36

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read