NAQT Canada Sectional (Region 2)

Date:	Saturday, February 6, 2010
Host:	McMaster University (Hamilton, ON, Canada)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT

Division I: SCT-10

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2010 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Toronto A	12–0	100.0%	4525	247	32	134	33	17.61	366.40
2	Michigan A	9–3	75.0%	3430	247	20	113	40	16.54	277.73
3	McMaster A	6–6	50.0%	2150	250	19	90	33	10.37	172.00
3	Western Ontario	6–6	50.0%	1895	239	10	80	7	10.89	158.58
5	Toronto B	6–5	54.5%	1440	209	14	62	39	10.59	137.80
6	Case Western	5–6	45.5%	1765	205	12	73	13	10.82	172.20
6	U of Rochester	5–6	45.5%	1490	184	8	66	12	10.41	161.96
8	Guelph A	6–5	54.5%	1885	226	9	83	10	10.54	166.81
9	Ottawa A	2–9	18.2%	915	237	3	54	10	6.67	77.22
10	RIT	0–11	0.0%	670	234	6	39	8	5.11	57.26

Division II: SCT-10DII (shares with SCT-10)

Jump to Division I

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2010 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Ottawa B	9–2	81.8%	3565	223	25	104	12	17.13	319.73
2	Waterloo A	8–3	72.7%	3915	232	32	102	23	18.88	337.50
3	Michigan B	7–2	77.8%	3010	187	31	76	25	17.85	321.93
4	McMaster B	7–2	77.8%	2180	184	9	78	15	15.40	236.96
5	Toronto C	6–3	66.7%	2040	186	13	74	19	13.79	219.35
6	Waterloo B	4–5	44.4%	750	178	1	46	9	6.81	84.27
7	Guelph B	3–6	33.3%	1100	178	3	57	11	9.00	123.60
8	Ottawa C	2–7	22.2%	760	186	4	33	4	10.54	81.72
9	Michigan C	1–8	11.1%	715	191	2	43	5	6.22	74.87
10	Guelph C	0–9	0.0%	730	179	3	39	7	7.86	81.56
	Queen's

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.