NAQT Region 7 Sectional (Region 7)

Date:	Saturday, February 5, 2011
Host:	The Ohio State University (Columbus, OH)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT

Division I: SCT-11

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2011 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Michigan A	8–1	88.9%	3280	194	24	100	29	16.93	338.14
2	Carnegie Mellon A	8–1	88.9%	2505	188	15	92	20	13.64	266.49
3	Michigan B	8–1	88.9%	2670	189	20	93	28	14.11	282.54
4	Louisville B	6–3	66.7%	1345	202	4	69	19	9.45	133.17
4	Case Western A	5–4	55.6%	1710	187	11	75	8	9.71	182.89
6	Northern Kentucky	4–5	44.4%	1640	184	7	66	24	13.63	178.26
7	Louisville A	3–6	33.3%	1030	192	2	56	14	8.79	107.29
8	Miami-Ohio A	2–7	22.2%	1085	196	7	50	10	9.30	110.71
9	Bowling Green A	1–8	11.1%	650	190	0	45	6	5.11	68.42
9	Cuyahoga CC	0–9	0.0%	865	198	4	53	11	5.79	87.37

Division II: SCT-11DII (shares with SCT-11)

Jump to Division I

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2011 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Michigan C	11–1	91.7%	4440	250	39	110	39	19.80	355.20
2	Ohio State A	11–1	91.7%	5645	257	41	129	22	22.65	439.30
3	Ohio State B	11–1	91.7%	5420	256	48	125	30	20.81	423.44
4	Pittsburgh A	9–3	75.0%	2635	244	14	93	22	15.00	215.98
5	Wooster A	8–4	66.7%	2740	248	17	92	9	14.77	220.97
6	Pittsburgh B	6–6	50.0%	2050	243	11	83	10	11.76	168.72
6	Case Western B	6–6	50.0%	2120	252	9	91	28	12.15	168.25
6	Louisville C	6–6	50.0%	2040	244	8	82	26	13.67	167.21
9	Carnegie Mellon B	4–8	33.3%	1570	245	4	71	7	11.13	128.16
10	Miami-Ohio B	3–9	25.0%	1365	259	7	62	22	10.87	105.41
11	Miami-Ohio C	2–10	16.7%	940	260	6	44	12	9.40	72.31
12	Bowling Green B	1–11	8.3%	665	257	3	38	8	6.83	51.75
13	Wooster B	0–12	0.0%	360	259	0	22	2	6.82	27.80

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.