2012 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament
Date: |
Friday, March 30, 2012 – Saturday, March 31, 2012 |
Location: |
Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL) |
Division I Pool A
The displayed ranks are the order of finish within each pool. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
# |
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
1 |
Virginia A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 3045 | 165 | 38 |
63 |
19 | 19.21 | 369.09 |
---|
1 |
Harvard | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2975 | 164 | 35 |
64 |
14 | 18.99 | 362.80 |
---|
3 |
UC San Diego | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2910 | 166 | 23 |
83 |
19 | 17.26 | 350.60 |
---|
4 |
Georgia Tech | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1955 | 159 | 17 |
58 |
16 | 16.00 | 245.91 |
---|
5 |
Northwestern | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1615 | 162 | 10 |
58 |
15 | 14.12 | 199.38 |
---|
6 |
RPI | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1400 | 159 | 6 |
55 |
13 | 13.52 | 176.10 |
---|
7 |
Toronto | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1100 | 159 | 14 |
38 |
18 | 11.54 | 138.36 |
---|
8 |
Chicago C | 0–7 | 0.0% | 260 | 162 | 1 |
16 |
3 | 5.88 | 32.10 |
---|
Pool C
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Yale | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3700 | 162 | 33 |
81 |
7 | 21.32 | 456.79 |
---|
Penn | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2510 | 157 | 33 |
52 |
23 | 18.94 | 319.75 |
---|
Brown | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2120 | 156 | 20 |
59 |
28 | 17.34 | 271.79 |
---|
Alabama | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1755 | 152 | 14 |
57 |
15 | 14.79 | 230.92 |
---|
Carleton College | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1635 | 158 | 15 |
53 |
10 | 13.68 | 206.96 |
---|
Arizona State | 2–5 | 28.6% | 820 | 148 | 10 |
29 |
8 | 10.77 | 110.81 |
---|
Chicago B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1240 | 152 | 9 |
48 |
13 | 12.11 | 163.16 |
---|
Ohio State B | 1–6 | 14.3% | 955 | 153 | 12 |
34 |
17 | 11.30 | 124.84 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Maryland | 7–0 | 100.0% | 2895 | 163 | 29 |
70 |
22 | 18.89 | 355.21 |
---|
Chicago A | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2595 | 158 | 35 |
54 |
20 | 18.31 | 328.48 |
---|
MIT | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2215 | 153 | 26 |
54 |
8 | 16.56 | 289.54 |
---|
WUSTL | 4–3 | 57.1% | 1950 | 155 | 12 |
64 |
16 | 15.92 | 251.61 |
---|
Columbia | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1630 | 159 | 12 |
52 |
14 | 15.62 | 205.03 |
---|
Michigan B | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1370 | 153 | 9 |
54 |
13 | 12.06 | 179.08 |
---|
VCU | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1435 | 155 | 6 |
56 |
10 | 13.47 | 185.16 |
---|
Illinois B | 0–7 | 0.0% | 685 | 156 | 6 |
33 |
15 | 8.72 | 87.82 |
---|
Division II Pool A
Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
Harvard | 7–0 | 100.0% | 3230 | 158 | 39 |
60 |
26 | 21.97 | 408.86 |
---|
Delaware | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2180 | 152 | 14 |
69 |
13 | 16.20 | 286.84 |
---|
Chipola | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2190 | 162 | 30 |
54 |
28 | 15.95 | 270.37 |
---|
Chicago | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2035 | 158 | 10 |
66 |
25 | 17.76 | 257.59 |
---|
RPI | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1645 | 161 | 8 |
60 |
14 | 14.63 | 204.35 |
---|
Valencia A | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1185 | 153 | 8 |
50 |
11 | 10.69 | 154.90 |
---|
Miami-Ohio | 1–6 | 14.3% | 1095 | 159 | 14 |
32 |
17 | 14.13 | 137.74 |
---|
Louisville | 0–7 | 0.0% | 830 | 159 | 6 |
34 |
14 | 11.75 | 104.40 |
---|
Pool D
Team | W–L | % | Points | TUH | P | TU | I | PPB | PP20TUH |
UCF | 6–1 | 85.7% | 2240 | 163 | 20 |
67 |
24 | 15.98 | 274.85 |
---|
Minnesota A | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2195 | 159 | 21 |
60 |
28 | 17.53 | 276.10 |
---|
Michigan | 5–2 | 71.4% | 2160 | 161 | 20 |
61 |
12 | 16.17 | 268.32 |
---|
Maryland | 4–3 | 57.1% | 2335 | 165 | 18 |
63 |
17 | 18.77 | 283.03 |
---|
Ottawa | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1390 | 155 | 13 |
48 |
9 | 12.46 | 179.35 |
---|
Harding | 3–4 | 42.9% | 1335 | 159 | 6 |
54 |
15 | 13.00 | 167.92 |
---|
Valencia B | 2–5 | 28.6% | 1215 | 152 | 13 |
45 |
22 | 11.72 | 159.87 |
---|
Jefferson CC | 0–7 | 0.0% | 925 | 146 | 9 |
36 |
11 | 10.78 | 126.71 |
---|
Explanation of Statistics
Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.
Read