2012 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date:	Friday, March 30, 2012 – Saturday, March 31, 2012
Location:	Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL)

Division I Pool 1

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Virginia A	6–1	85.7%	3010	162	43	58	15	18.42	371.60
Illinois A	5–2	71.4%	2215	162	27	52	14	17.22	273.46
Yale	4–3	57.1%	2710	165	36	54	8	18.56	328.48
Maryland	4–3	57.1%	2015	161	16	56	23	18.47	250.31
Harvard	3–4	42.9%	2155	160	28	47	17	18.00	269.38
Chicago A	3–4	42.9%	2020	155	21	52	21	17.67	260.65
Minnesota	2–5	28.6%	1930	165	20	49	14	17.54	233.94
Brown	1–6	14.3%	1615	158	21	40	20	16.39	204.43

Pool 2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Michigan A	7–0	100.0%	2990	163	35	69	13	17.69	366.87
UC San Diego	6–1	85.7%	2305	163	18	64	17	18.05	282.82
Penn	5–2	71.4%	2415	157	28	56	21	18.33	307.64
MIT	3–4	42.9%	1895	154	24	51	5	14.00	246.10
Georgia Tech	3–4	42.9%	1665	165	17	49	16	15.15	201.82
Alabama	2–5	28.6%	1665	156	13	55	12	14.41	213.46
WUSTL	2–5	28.6%	1200	156	9	43	15	13.65	153.85
Ohio State A	0–7	0.0%	1435	160	8	51	17	15.08	179.38

Pool 3

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Columbia	7–0	100.0%	2295	159	10	83	15	14.95	288.68
Virginia B	6–1	85.7%	1605	156	14	54	17	13.82	205.77
RPI	3–4	42.9%	1635	162	5	68	4	12.33	201.85
Carnegie Mellon	3–4	42.9%	1470	153	8	61	12	11.59	192.16
Carleton College	3–4	42.9%	1520	160	17	51	19	12.50	190.00
Michigan B	3–4	42.9%	1280	157	7	53	17	12.17	163.06
Northwestern	2–5	28.6%	1450	159	15	49	19	12.97	182.39
Arizona State	1–6	14.3%	855	150	2	42	11	10.45	114.00

Pool 4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Chicago B	6–1	85.7%	1820	146	12	65	18	14.03	249.32
VCU	6–1	85.7%	1850	153	9	72	13	13.09	241.83
Toronto	4–3	57.1%	1380	153	8	54	20	13.23	180.39
Illinois B	4–3	57.1%	1145	150	6	59	15	8.31	152.67
Texas A&M	3–4	42.9%	1200	156	6	53	18	11.36	153.85
Ohio State B	3–4	42.9%	1170	153	9	47	21	11.96	152.94
Guelph	2–5	28.6%	1045	153	6	44	7	11.00	136.60
Chicago C	0–7	0.0%	540	152	0	29	2	8.97	71.05

Division II Pool 1/2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Harvard	7–0	100.0%	3155	164	35	60	18	22.32	384.76
UCF	4–3	57.1%	2020	162	27	47	21	16.89	249.38
NYU	4–3	57.1%	1985	161	21	48	16	18.41	246.58
Michigan State	3–4	42.9%	2530	164	28	53	14	20.37	308.54
MIT	3–4	42.9%	1965	163	18	56	9	15.95	241.10
Delaware	3–4	42.9%	1765	158	10	61	23	15.77	223.42
Michigan	3–4	42.9%	1660	160	5	60	17	16.46	207.50
Wisconsin	1–6	14.3%	1855	164	22	48	19	16.29	226.22

Pool 3/4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Chipola	7–0	100.0%	2410	161	32	56	24	16.93	299.38
Maryland	5–2	71.4%	2020	165	18	55	14	17.40	244.85
Chicago	4–3	57.1%	2000	161	13	62	21	17.20	248.45
Carnegie Mellon	4–3	57.1%	1930	163	10	65	8	15.60	236.81
Minnesota A	3–4	42.9%	2125	165	19	60	22	17.09	257.58
Toronto	2–5	28.6%	1905	165	20	52	11	15.83	230.91
Notre Dame	2–5	28.6%	1650	159	18	47	10	14.77	207.55
Minnesota B	1–6	14.3%	1305	161	10	48	21	13.45	162.11

Pool 5/6

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Case Western	6–1	85.7%	2175	164	13	74	14	15.06	265.24
Harding	5–2	71.4%	1825	162	8	73	17	13.09	225.31
Northwestern	4–3	57.1%	1880	160	12	63	14	15.20	235.00
RPI	4–3	57.1%	1705	163	14	58	21	14.17	209.20
Valencia A	3–4	42.9%	1285	161	4	62	17	10.45	159.63
Ottawa	2–5	28.6%	1525	164	8	62	13	12.14	185.98
Truman State	2–5	28.6%	1375	160	9	48	4	13.68	171.88
Alabama	2–5	28.6%	990	156	6	45	12	10.00	126.92

Pool 7/8

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Claremont Colleges	6–1	85.7%	1300	148	7	55	17	11.77	175.68
Oklahoma State	5–2	71.4%	1475	154	8	61	17	12.03	191.56
Miami-Ohio	5–2	71.4%	1360	154	12	52	18	11.72	176.62
Valencia B	4–3	57.1%	1130	152	9	46	17	11.27	148.68
Jefferson CC	3–4	42.9%	1250	147	13	43	15	12.50	170.07
Louisville	2–5	28.6%	1095	149	3	53	20	11.07	146.98
Lincoln Land CC	2–5	28.6%	1060	152	2	49	10	11.57	139.47
Coastal Alabama - South	1–6	14.3%	770	150	0	44	6	8.18	102.67

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read