NAQT New England Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 8, 2014
Host: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-14)

#UGTeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 1 Yale A12–0100.0%673028285 116 2521.99477.30
2 Brown A8–466.7%408027143 101 2717.78301.11
2 Columbia A8–466.7%412027651 86 3719.56298.55
2 2 Dartmouth A8–466.7%367027450 79 4018.06267.88
5 MIT A4–833.3%286026329 74 1917.28217.49
6 3 UMass1–118.3%235527425 67 5617.28171.90
6 3 Williams1–118.3%228026625 68 2914.73171.43

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2014 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

Division II (SCT-14DII) Jump to Division I

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Yale B12–0100.0%489528665 90 5021.37342.31
2 Harvard A10–283.3%632528996 83 4524.04437.72
3 Columbia B8–466.7%488528268 86 3720.71346.45
4 MIT B9–469.2%548530068 99 1121.14365.67
5 Harvard B7–653.8%457030046 97 3421.54304.67
6 Northeastern A5–838.5%417530140 97 1719.64277.41
6 Brown B5–838.5%400530744 92 4519.49260.91
8 Amherst A7–653.8%294527327 85 1415.71215.75
9 Amherst B5–838.5%306029335 87 2114.51208.87
10 Dartmouth B2–1115.4%203526718 69 2813.97152.43
11 Northeastern B0–130.0%17053008 67 712.67113.67

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2014 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read