NAQT New England Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 8, 2014
Host: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-14)

#UGTeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 1 Yale A12–0100.0%673028285 116 2521.99477.30
2 Brown A8–466.7%408027143 101 2717.78301.11
2 Columbia A8–466.7%412027651 86 3719.56298.55
2 2 Dartmouth A8–466.7%367027450 79 4018.06267.88
5 MIT A4–833.3%286026329 74 1917.28217.49
6 3 UMass1–118.3%235527425 67 5617.28171.90
6 3 Williams1–118.3%228026625 68 2914.73171.43

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2014 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

Division II (SCT-14DII) Jump to Division I

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Yale B10–0100.0%414523558 73 4321.07352.77
2 Harvard A9–190.0%553523888 65 3324.38465.13
3 Columbia B8–280.0%428023457 77 3120.97365.81
4 MIT B6–460.0%414023152 70 1022.21358.44
5 Harvard B6–460.0%381523038 81 2921.68331.74
6 Northeastern A4–640.0%318523529 76 1219.52271.06
6 Brown B4–640.0%303523633 70 3819.71257.20
8 Amherst A4–640.0%193020718 55 1015.89186.47
9 Amherst B3–730.0%225522631 59 1814.33199.56
10 Dartmouth B1–910.0%141020215 44 2114.41139.60
11 Northeastern B0–100.0%13002285 52 312.63114.04

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2014 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read