2015 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date:	Friday, March 27, 2015 – Saturday, March 28, 2015
Location:	Hilton Atlanta (Atlanta, GA)

Division I Pool A

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Virginia	7–0	100.0%	3795	161	57	61	8	20.08	471.43
MIT A	6–1	85.7%	2460	159	17	71	13	17.73	309.43
Georgia Tech	5–2	71.4%	1745	163	15	57	14	14.17	214.11
North Carolina	4–3	57.1%	1735	158	16	53	11	14.78	219.62
UC Berkeley A	3–4	42.9%	1675	158	7	64	16	14.23	212.03
Western Kentucky	2–5	28.6%	1280	163	11	45	7	12.50	157.06
Chicago B	1–6	14.3%	835	160	8	35	11	9.77	104.38
Waterloo	0–7	0.0%	575	160	2	35	3	5.68	71.88

Pool B

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Penn	7–0	100.0%	3510	160	40	74	16	19.74	438.75
UC San Diego	6–1	85.7%	2315	154	17	69	12	16.63	300.65
Yale	5–2	71.4%	2280	157	20	61	10	17.53	290.45
Northwestern	4–3	57.1%	1575	153	7	64	6	12.11	205.88
Illinois	3–4	42.9%	1460	154	14	49	16	13.33	189.61
Ottawa	2–5	28.6%	1160	156	11	40	15	13.14	148.72
UCF	1–6	14.3%	800	150	5	35	15	11.25	106.67
Maryland B	0–7	0.0%	510	150	2	26	6	8.93	68.00

Pool C

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Maryland A	6–1	85.7%	3085	162	34	70	13	18.65	380.86
Michigan A	6–1	85.7%	2380	151	20	63	14	18.31	315.23
WUSTL A	5–2	71.4%	2095	158	15	64	10	16.20	265.19
NYU	4–3	57.1%	1565	157	11	57	26	14.12	199.36
Minnesota A	3–4	42.9%	1595	158	16	50	13	13.94	201.90
New Mexico State	2–5	28.6%	1285	155	12	44	7	12.50	165.81
Vanderbilt	2–5	28.6%	1225	153	3	57	8	10.83	160.13
Carleton University A	0–7	0.0%	355	154	3	19	6	6.82	46.10

Pool D

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Chicago A	7–0	100.0%	3215	160	33	71	20	20.29	401.88
Stanford A	6–1	85.7%	2820	160	27	72	17	17.98	352.50
William & Mary	5–2	71.4%	1440	159	9	56	13	12.86	181.13
Columbia	4–3	57.1%	1925	153	14	60	13	15.95	251.63
Harvard	3–4	42.9%	1740	160	21	43	9	16.25	217.50
Arizona State	2–5	28.6%	1250	157	5	52	9	12.50	159.24
McGill A	1–6	14.3%	960	156	11	35	5	10.22	123.08
Texas A&M A	0–7	0.0%	680	155	6	33	8	7.69	87.74

Division II Pool A

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Texas	7–0	100.0%	3120	159	29	72	13	20.10	392.45
UC Berkeley B	4–3	57.1%	2350	159	14	70	12	17.86	295.60
Carnegie Mellon	4–3	57.1%	2065	163	14	63	9	16.49	253.37
Minnesota B	4–3	57.1%	1935	159	22	51	21	16.44	243.40
Wofford	4–3	57.1%	1830	158	9	61	19	16.86	231.65
WUSTL B	3–4	42.9%	1700	158	7	57	7	16.56	215.19
State College-Manatee	2–5	28.6%	1385	160	10	48	9	13.79	173.12
Alabama	0–7	0.0%	495	162	3	29	14	7.19	61.11

Pool B

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Chicago C	7–0	100.0%	2800	160	27	61	17	21.25	350.00
Carleton College	6–1	85.7%	2250	159	26	57	12	16.27	283.02
MIT B	5–2	71.4%	2750	158	25	64	21	20.67	348.10
Cornell	4–3	57.1%	1885	153	11	61	20	16.81	246.41
McGill B	3–4	42.9%	1965	152	22	50	23	17.36	258.55
Louisiana Tech	2–5	28.6%	1655	151	17	45	8	15.97	219.21
Claremont Colleges	1–6	14.3%	1240	149	8	45	14	13.96	166.44
Valencia	0–7	0.0%	950	152	5	38	7	12.33	125.00

Pool C

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Stanford B	7–0	100.0%	3410	160	40	66	12	20.85	426.25
Pittsburgh	6–1	85.7%	2765	160	20	72	11	19.57	345.62
Maryland C	5–2	71.4%	2105	156	19	57	10	17.11	269.87
Amherst	4–3	57.1%	1990	161	18	57	20	16.67	247.20
Florida	3–4	42.9%	1620	156	12	54	16	14.85	207.69
Wright State	2–5	28.6%	1415	156	9	50	10	14.07	181.41
Duke	1–6	14.3%	1295	159	7	49	26	14.82	162.89
Redlands CC	0–7	0.0%	325	158	2	19	9	7.14	41.14

Pool D

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Georgetown	6–1	85.7%	2695	156	21	67	8	19.89	345.51
Texas A&M B	6–1	85.7%	2515	155	14	72	9	18.95	324.52
Georgia	6–1	85.7%	2545	158	20	67	17	19.08	322.15
Michigan B	4–3	57.1%	1785	150	14	53	17	16.87	238.00
Carleton University B	3–4	42.9%	1695	156	21	45	18	15.45	217.31
UCLA	2–5	28.6%	1850	161	8	60	4	16.91	229.81
Central Oklahoma	1–6	14.3%	1340	148	5	54	19	13.90	181.08
Broward	0–7	0.0%	630	150	3	29	9	10.62	84.00

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read