NAQT Northeast Sectional

Date: February 7, 2015
Host: Columbia University (New York, NY)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-15)

#UGTeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A Penn A12–0100.0%6740286104 92 3822.70471.33
2A MIT A9–469.2%583530972 112 3020.57377.67
3A 1B Yale A8–561.5%488030844 118 3119.72316.88
4A 2 Harvard A7–558.3%412527934 104 1919.35295.70
5A NYU A7–558.3%393527737 101 4118.66284.12
5 3 Columbia7–558.3%308027425 101 1614.09224.82
7 4 Penn B5–741.7%275027127 82 3015.37202.95
8 5 Cornell A2–1016.7%215526713 81 2213.40161.42
9 6 Penn C3–925.0%14802717 65 3312.36109.23
10 7 Yale B1–118.3%149027410 68 239.94108.76

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2015 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DI) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2015 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DI) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II (SCT-15)

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 MIT B11–191.7%566027973 86 3224.31405.73
2 Princeton10–283.3%572528472 96 2922.80403.17
3 Yale C8–372.7%510025567 85 2322.11400.00
3 Amherst A8–372.7%454525569 71 3421.21356.47
3 Cornell B8–372.7%426024862 81 3318.78343.55
6 NYU B6–554.5%321524751 58 4018.99260.32
7 Vassar5–645.5%333524641 71 1718.71271.14
8 Harvard B4–736.4%410025353 74 4121.81324.11
8 Rutgers4–736.4%343025546 72 1617.80269.02
10 Hamilton2–918.2%206525219 59 915.83163.89
11 Boston College1–109.1%166025523 48 4815.14130.20
12 Amherst B0–110.0%148524513 46 1014.92121.22

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2015 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DII) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read