Manheim Township Academic Challenge

Date:	Saturday, December 19, 2015
Host:	Manheim Township High School (Lancaster, PA)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT

Varsity Division: IS-151A

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2016 High School National Championship Tournament.
The highlighted teams marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2016 Small School National Championship Tournament.
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1^A	Henderson A	9–2	81.8%	4440	220	63	69	31	22.42	403.64
2^A	Cedar Crest A	9–2	81.8%	4775	220	58	78	17	23.60	434.09
3^A	Great Valley A	10–1	90.9%	4910	220	74	64	24	23.77	446.36
4^A	Friends Select A	8–3	72.7%	3790	220	50	65	16	21.48	344.55
5^A	Hempfield A	9–2	81.8%	3965	200	39	83	6	21.15	396.50
6^A^B	Camp Hill A	7–4	63.6%	3465	200	35	74	14	20.83	346.50
7^A	Cedar Crest B	7–4	63.6%	3525	220	33	79	6	20.27	320.45
8	Great Valley B	7–4	63.6%	3110	220	37	70	29	18.69	282.73
9	Lancaster Mennonite	5–5	50.0%	2820	200	25	61	15	22.21	282.00
9^B	Bermudian Springs A	4–6	40.0%	2285	200	21	55	4	18.95	228.50
11^B	Boiling Springs A	4–6	40.0%	1980	200	20	51	20	17.89	198.00
11	Wallenpaupack	3–7	30.0%	1720	200	15	45	9	18.17	172.00
13	Archmere (Claymont, Delaware)	7–3	70.0%	2375	180	26	54	17	19.12	263.89
13	Concord (Wilmington, Delaware)	5–5	50.0%	2610	180	30	57	18	19.31	290.00
15	PALCS	5–5	50.0%	2175	180	31	44	16	18.00	241.67
16	Berwick A	5–5	50.0%	2540	180	18	72	12	17.89	282.22
16	Henderson B	4–6	40.0%	2130	180	26	47	20	18.77	236.67
18	Emmaus	3–7	30.0%	1665	100	14	44	5	17.93	333.00
19	Friends Select B	3–5	37.5%	1625	160	17	46	16	15.71	203.12
19	Boiling Springs C	3–5	37.5%	1245	160	17	33	12	14.40	155.62
21	Camp Hill B	2–6	25.0%	1645	160	14	47	5	16.23	205.62
21	Northeastern B	2–6	25.0%	1000	160	4	36	6	15.25	125.00
23	Northeastern A	2–6	25.0%	1650	160	10	50	6	17.17	206.25
23	Boiling Springs B	1–7	12.5%	935	160	8	35	17	12.79	116.88
25	Eastern Lebanon County A	2–6	25.0%	870	160	6	32	2	12.37	108.75
25	Eastern Lebanon County B	0–8	0.0%	290	160	3	16	3	5.26	36.25

#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Carver A	7–2	77.8%	2070	183	12	78	14	13.11	226.23
2	Wissahickon A	6–3	66.7%	2285	180	19	61	16	18.38	253.89
3	Central B	7–2	77.8%	2180	183	11	73	11	16.54	238.25
4	Henderson C	6–3	66.7%	1585	180	12	55	7	13.28	176.11
5	Central A	7–2	77.8%	2205	180	18	67	15	15.76	245.00
6	William Tennent A	5–4	55.6%	1965	180	15	60	14	16.13	218.33
7	Cedar Crest C	6–3	66.7%	2015	180	12	66	19	16.28	223.89
8	Great Valley C	4–5	44.4%	1500	180	8	64	20	11.67	166.67
9	Cedar Crest D	5–3	62.5%	1180	160	7	49	13	11.61	147.50
9	Hempfield B	4–4	50.0%	1360	160	7	51	9	13.62	170.00
9	Wissahickon B	4–4	50.0%	1200	160	11	46	9	10.88	150.00
12	Berwick B	2–6	25.0%	505	160	1	30	2	6.45	63.12
13	Manheim Township Middle	4–4	50.0%	1195	160	6	51	9	11.23	149.38
14	Bermudian Springs B	3–5	37.5%	920	160	6	41	10	10.00	115.00
14	Boiling Springs D	2–6	25.0%	645	160	0	30	1	11.67	80.62
16	Carver B	2–6	25.0%	620	160	6	30	8	7.50	77.50
16	Great Valley D	2–6	25.0%	530	160	5	28	3	5.76	66.25
18	William Tennent B	0–8	0.0%	400	160	1	25	7	6.54	50.00

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.