2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date:	Friday, April 8, 2016 – Saturday, April 9, 2016
Location:	Hyatt Regency O'Hare Chicago (Rosemont, IL)

Division I Pool 1

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Michigan A	5–2	71.4%	2685	162	28	60	21	20.11	331.48
Chicago A	5–2	71.4%	2665	165	27	61	22	20.00	323.03
Stanford A	5–2	71.4%	2410	162	24	59	18	18.67	297.53
Maryland A	5–2	71.4%	2360	166	27	55	21	18.41	284.34
Yale A	4–3	57.1%	2120	163	26	53	16	16.20	260.12
Columbia A	2–5	28.6%	1795	161	17	47	18	18.12	222.98
Penn	1–6	14.3%	1520	160	14	45	26	16.78	190.00
MIT A	1–6	14.3%	1450	159	17	38	15	16.18	182.39

Pool 2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Minnesota	6–1	85.7%	1825	151	18	55	19	15.07	241.72
UC Berkeley A	5–2	71.4%	2175	155	17	63	8	16.62	280.65
WUSTL A	5–2	71.4%	1945	157	14	59	17	16.85	247.77
Harvard A	4–3	57.1%	1830	158	13	60	11	14.93	231.65
Stanford B	4–3	57.1%	1495	154	11	51	14	14.35	194.16
Northwestern	2–5	28.6%	1760	155	15	54	15	15.51	227.10
Louisville	2–5	28.6%	1520	154	9	54	21	15.08	197.40
Illinois A	0–7	0.0%	1220	150	10	44	10	12.59	162.67

Pool 3

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
North Carolina	6–1	85.7%	1730	148	18	51	24	15.51	233.78
McGill A	6–1	85.7%	1735	151	9	67	10	12.89	229.80
Georgia A	4–3	57.1%	1235	146	9	53	16	10.48	169.18
Brown	3–4	42.9%	1480	158	8	54	18	14.68	187.34
Texas A	3–4	42.9%	1325	146	3	56	16	13.56	181.51
Duke	3–4	42.9%	1090	150	2	52	16	11.48	145.33
William & Mary	2–5	28.6%	1230	149	9	47	21	13.04	165.10
Columbia B	1–6	14.3%	1010	150	7	40	15	12.34	134.67

Pool 4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
UC Berkeley B	7–0	100.0%	1975	154	13	70	10	13.61	256.49
Michigan B	5–2	71.4%	1355	155	13	50	18	11.90	174.84
Florida	5–2	71.4%	1175	153	8	50	15	10.86	153.59
Missouri	4–3	57.1%	1620	160	9	66	13	11.87	202.50
Toronto	3–4	42.9%	1030	154	5	47	9	10.19	133.77
Michigan State	2–5	28.6%	1055	161	10	41	11	10.78	131.06
Cornell	2–5	28.6%	925	149	2	45	15	11.06	124.16
Central Oklahoma	0–7	0.0%	230	166	1	17	7	4.44	27.71

Division II Pool 1/2

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Chicago B	6–1	85.7%	3240	167	47	54	19	20.69	388.02
Oklahoma	6–1	85.7%	3160	164	52	42	20	21.91	385.37
Virginia	6–1	85.7%	3035	166	37	56	14	21.40	365.66
MIT B	3–4	42.9%	1995	161	21	48	12	18.26	247.83
Notre Dame	3–4	42.9%	1945	163	15	55	30	18.86	238.65
Columbia C	2–5	28.6%	1755	158	22	41	19	17.62	222.15
Yale B	1–6	14.3%	1935	158	23	43	10	18.33	244.94
Georgetown	1–6	14.3%	1650	161	18	40	14	18.10	204.97

Pool 3/4

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
U of Rochester	7–0	100.0%	2620	163	25	59	11	20.36	321.47
Penn State A	5–2	71.4%	2080	160	22	57	14	15.82	260.00
Chicago C	4–3	57.1%	2295	163	18	63	15	18.15	281.60
Harvard B	4–3	57.1%	1795	164	20	53	27	15.07	218.90
Maryland B	3–4	42.9%	1845	158	19	48	22	17.76	233.54
VCU	2–5	28.6%	1885	165	18	54	17	16.11	228.48
Georgia B	2–5	28.6%	1835	167	17	54	10	15.35	219.76
Gettysburg College	1–6	14.3%	1465	162	16	43	11	14.41	180.86

Pool 5/6

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
McGill B	6–1	85.7%	2125	148	17	58	16	18.27	287.16
North Carolina State	5–2	71.4%	1695	148	14	55	23	15.22	229.05
Columbia D	4–3	57.1%	1590	141	10	54	12	15.00	225.53
Chicago D	4–3	57.1%	1540	143	10	51	12	15.41	215.38
Penn State B	3–4	42.9%	1455	144	8	50	15	15.69	202.08
Wisconsin	2–5	28.6%	1515	148	14	46	9	14.83	204.73
Illinois B	2–5	28.6%	1305	147	11	48	14	12.37	177.55
Texas B	2–5	28.6%	1155	149	12	36	9	13.75	155.03

Pool 7/8

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
WUSTL B	7–0	100.0%	1680	150	9	62	15	14.08	224.00
Ohio State	6–1	85.7%	1720	156	9	67	23	13.55	220.51
UCF	4–3	57.1%	1550	156	9	61	15	12.57	198.72
Jefferson CC	4–3	57.1%	1150	157	5	48	7	11.89	146.50
Coastal Alabama - South	3–4	42.9%	1250	153	8	51	12	11.53	163.40
Youngstown State	2–5	28.6%	780	152	3	44	7	7.02	102.63
Chipola	1–6	14.3%	960	151	6	45	6	8.82	127.15
State College-Manatee	1–6	14.3%	780	151	5	36	13	10.00	103.31

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read