NAQT Great Lakes Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016
Host: Youngstown State University (Youngstown, OH)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-16)

#UGTeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A Michigan B10–190.9%518524775 86 3420.93419.84
2A Michigan A9–281.8%514024567 91 2721.27419.59
3 1B Michigan State A6–460.0%213021714 75 2014.60196.31
4 2 Kenyon4–640.0%241020415 76 1316.37236.27
5 Pittsburgh A5–550.0%203019916 74 1812.67204.02
5 3 Carnegie Mellon A5–550.0%193519812 73 912.74195.45
7 Case Western A2–820.0%13051918 56 1711.09136.65
8 4 Wright State A0–100.0%10751975 49 1410.74109.14

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DI) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DI) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II (SCT-16)

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Penn State A11–191.7%423522953 83 2620.15369.87
2 Ohio State A10–283.3%404023029 108 918.76351.30
3 Penn State B8–372.7%371020332 91 1619.51365.52
3 Carnegie Mellon B8–372.7%318520435 75 3018.73312.25
5 Ohio State B7–463.6%270019529 67 2317.81276.92
6 Michigan State B5–645.5%325521533 79 2618.75302.79
6 Michigan C5–645.5%236520324 70 1514.68233.00
6 Pittsburgh B5–645.5%228020121 69 1515.00226.87
9 Case Western B3–827.3%180519813 61 1614.59182.32
9 Wright State B3–827.3%150020813 53 912.42144.23
11 Edinboro1–109.1%12502086 55 2612.13120.19
11 Kent State1–109.1%2752082 16 97.2226.44

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (DII) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read