NAQT Northern California Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016
Host: University of California-Berkeley (Berkeley, CA)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-16)

#UGTeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Stanford B10–283.3%483526868 89 2019.27360.82
2 1 UC Berkeley A9–375.0%487526455 102 2820.19369.32
3 Stanford A7–370.0%493522774 77 2120.93434.80
4 UC Berkeley B4–640.0%294521931 76 1416.73268.95
5 American River2–820.0%148022610 49 1215.25130.97
6 2 UC Berkeley C0–100.0%7302187 32 38.2166.97

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

Division II (SCT-16DII)

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 UC Berkeley D11–191.7%441522841 101 2120.39387.28
2 Cal Poly10–376.9%297525718 103 2714.96231.52
3 UC Berkeley F9–375.0%351521832 90 1918.28322.48
4 UC Berkeley E7–463.6%265520510 91 2216.88259.02
5 UC Berkeley J6–554.5%231521317 78 1814.42217.37
5 UC Berkeley I6–554.5%192021919 66 3313.41175.34
7 UC Berkeley H5–645.5%194520321 60 2814.44191.63
7 San Jose State5–645.5%190521313 71 2213.21178.87
9 UC Berkeley G4–736.4%190021315 70 1512.35178.40
9 Fresno State A4–736.4%178021511 70 1812.41165.58
11 UC Davis1–109.1%9352114 49 77.9288.63
12 Fresno State B0–110.0%7202095 39 218.1868.90

The highlighted team qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read