Darien Invitational I

#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
1	Hunter B (New York, New York)	8–0	100.0%	2880	160	30	71	11	17.57	360.00
2	E. O. Smith B	8–0	100.0%	3100	160	24	85	10	17.80	387.50
3	Needham (Massachusetts)	6–2	75.0%	2735	160	27	70	14	17.53	341.88
4	North Babylon (New York)	6–2	75.0%	2680	160	21	72	18	18.66	335.00
5	Middlesex Middle	5–3	62.5%	2660	160	33	59	13	17.83	332.50
6	Lexington B (Massachusetts)	6–2	75.0%	2330	160	28	59	20	16.32	291.25
7	Lexington C (Massachusetts)	5–3	62.5%	2010	160	30	49	24	15.06	251.25
8	Suffield A	6–2	75.0%	2230	160	18	64	14	16.95	278.75
9	Ithaca B (New York)	5–3	62.5%	1990	160	21	49	7	17.43	248.75
10	East Brunswick B (New Jersey)	4–4	50.0%	1445	160	16	46	7	12.58	180.62
11	Delaware Valley B (Milford, Pennsylvania)	3–5	37.5%	1190	160	5	49	15	12.96	148.75
12	St. Luke's	3–5	37.5%	1580	160	11	58	10	12.83	197.50
13	Wallenpaupack (Hawley, Pennsylvania)	2–6	25.0%	1150	160	14	36	14	13.00	143.75
14	Ithaca C (New York)	2–6	25.0%	945	160	6	44	10	9.30	118.12
15	Emma Willard (Troy, New York)	2–6	25.0%	1085	160	9	41	12	12.00	135.62
16	Delaware Valley C (Milford, Pennsylvania)	1–7	12.5%	525	160	3	27	6	8.00	65.62
17	Newtown	0–8	0.0%	705	160	4	34	4	8.55	88.12
18	Suffield B	0–8	0.0%	175	160	0	14	9	5.71	21.88

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.