NAQT New England Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016
Host: Brown University (Providence, RI)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-16)

#UGTeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A 1B Columbia B12–192.3%509029762 109 4219.41342.76
2A Yale A10–376.9%527529683 78 3821.37356.42
3A 2 Harvard A8–466.7%393025557 76 3118.57308.24
4A Columbia A6–650.0%349025536 75 2220.81273.73
5A MIT A7–463.6%425023144 91 1620.44367.97
6 3 Amherst A4–736.4%305524151 62 3616.37253.53
7 4 Dartmouth3–827.3%265525436 66 1915.20209.06
8 5 MIT B4–736.4%247522918 81 2715.45216.16
9 Columbia C3–827.3%283523726 72 1318.45239.24
10 6 NYU A1–109.1%160023718 53 2613.10135.02

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II (SCT-16DII)

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Yale B12–192.3%592527679 91 2023.12429.35
2 MIT C10–376.9%576528177 87 1323.20410.32
3 Columbia D8–466.7%431525461 75 3420.74339.76
4 Columbia E6–650.0%375026341 76 2521.37285.17
5 Harvard B7–463.6%451024467 69 3421.95369.67
6 NYU B5–645.5%256022717 74 1417.97225.55
7 Boston College3–827.3%253022025 60 4621.00230.00
8 Amherst B4–736.4%235021819 69 2216.88215.60
9 Yale C3–827.3%178523412 55 1316.72152.56
10 UConn0–110.0%183021920 55 2814.93167.12

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read