NAQT New England Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016
Host: Brown University (Providence, RI)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I: SCT-16

# UG TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A 1B Columbia B9–0100.0%354520743 80 3218.68342.51
2A Yale A8–188.9%387520656 61 3122.05376.21
3A 2 Harvard A6–366.7%299519746 55 2418.56304.06
4A Columbia A6–366.7%273518929 56 1421.29289.42
5A MIT A5–455.6%341518737 71 1420.56365.24
6 3 Amherst A3–633.3%245019542 48 3416.78251.28
7 4 Dartmouth3–633.3%223520830 57 1514.83214.90
8 5 MIT B2–722.2%185018615 60 2315.20198.92
9 Columbia C2–722.2%225019420 56 1019.20231.96
10 6 NYU A1–811.1%123519515 39 2213.52126.67

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II: SCT-16DII (shares with SCT-16)

# TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Yale B9–0100.0%412018748 71 1623.28440.64
2 MIT C8–188.9%435019451 70 824.17448.45
3 Columbia D6–366.7%336019347 59 2720.75348.19
4 Columbia E6–366.7%300019631 62 1921.61306.12
5 Harvard B5–455.6%357520256 52 2821.81353.96
6 NYU B4–544.4%203518415 58 1317.74221.20
7 Boston College3–633.3%213517724 47 3420.77241.24
8 Amherst B2–722.2%186518418 50 1717.35202.72
9 Yale C2–722.2%13951999 45 1015.93140.20
10 UConn0–90.0%145018416 44 2414.83157.61

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read