Southside Tiger Invitational

Date:	Saturday, February 18, 2017
Host:	Southside High School (Greenville, SC)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT w/ Bouncebacks, w/o Interrupts

Varsity Division: IS-162

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2017 High School National Championship Tournament.
The highlighted teams marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2017 Small School National Championship Tournament (Charter and Private Division).
The highlighted team marked with ‘C’ qualified for the 2017 Small School National Championship Tournament (Traditional Public Schools Division).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	PP20TUH
1^A	Dorman B	5–0	100.0%	2020	80	505.00
2^A	Spartanburg	5–0	100.0%	2095	80	523.75
2^A	Dorman A	5–0	100.0%	2055	80	513.75
2^A^B	Thomas Jefferson Classical (Mooresboro, North Carolina)	5–0	100.0%	1895	80	473.75
5^A	Dutch Fork	4–1	80.0%	1690	80	422.50
5^A	Riverside	4–1	80.0%	1575	80	393.75
5^A	Wade Hampton B	4–1	80.0%	970	64	303.12
8	Wade Hampton A	4–1	80.0%	1430	80	357.50
9	Eastside	3–2	60.0%	1275	80	318.75
10	Mauldin A	2–3	40.0%	850	64	265.62
11^B	Oakbrook Prep A	3–2	60.0%	1080	80	270.00
12	Powdersville	2–3	40.0%	720	80	180.00
13	J. L. Mann	2–3	40.0%	1015	80	253.75
14^C	Lewisville	2–3	40.0%	690	80	172.50
15	Chapman	2–3	40.0%	610	80	152.50
16	Christ Church Episcopal	2–3	40.0%	715	80	178.75
17	James Island	1–4	20.0%	850	80	212.50
18	James Byrnes	2–3	40.0%	800	80	200.00
19	Oakbrook Prep B	1–4	20.0%	650	80	162.50
20	Socastee	1–4	20.0%	835	80	208.75
21	D. W. Daniel A	0–5	0.0%	775	80	193.75
22	D. W. Daniel B	0–5	0.0%	430	80	107.50
22	Greer	0–5	0.0%	330	80	82.50
24	Mauldin B	1–4	20.0%	400	80	100.00

Junior Varsity Division: IS-162

#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	PP20TUH
1	Thomas Jefferson Classical (Mooresboro, North Carolina)	4–1	80.0%	1190	80	297.50
2	Dorman	5–0	100.0%	1195	80	298.75
2	Dutch Fork	3–1	75.0%	775	64	242.19
4	Oakbrook Prep	3–1	75.0%	755	64	235.94
5	Mountain View (Lawrenceville, Georgia)	1–2	33.3%	505	48	210.42
6	Riverside	2–2	50.0%	600	64	187.50
7	Carolina	1–4	20.0%	355	80	88.75
7	Eastside	1–4	20.0%	225	64	70.31
9	D. W. Daniel	0–5	0.0%	385	64	120.31

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.