NAQT logo
Search Toggle menu

NAQT Great Lakes Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 4, 2017
Host: Youngstown State University (Youngstown, OH)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I: SCT-17

# UG TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A Michigan A12–192.3%629528274 113 3122.51446.45
2A Michigan B10–376.9%550528049 125 2020.80393.21
3A Ohio State A9–375.0%481526743 115 3620.25360.67
4 Penn State A6–650.0%278025323 89 2715.00219.76
5 1B Kenyon A7–653.8%321026717 111 914.77240.45
6 2 Pittsburgh A6–746.2%312027013 110 915.20231.11
7 3 Michigan State A4–736.4%203022611 81 3113.15179.65
8 4 Penn State B3–827.3%12502259 54 1310.16111.11
9 5 Carnegie Mellon A2–918.2%9902219 44 139.0689.59
10 6 Wright State1–109.1%11552198 56 118.28105.48

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2017 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2017 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II: SCT-17DII (shares with SCT-17)

Jump to Division I
# TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Ohio State B12–192.3%475523054 94 2921.28413.48
2 Michigan C11–284.6%374522643 72 3422.17331.42
3 Carnegie Mellon B9–375.0%312522036 73 3118.96284.09
4 Penn State C8–466.7%303020317 84 1519.90298.52
4 Michigan State B8–466.7%266520424 72 1717.40261.27
4 Ohio State C8–466.7%232019914 74 1016.14233.17
7 Case Western A7–558.3%277520924 74 1918.06265.55
8 Pittsburgh C5–741.7%185020313 61 714.59182.27
9 Kenyon B4–833.3%169519911 53 215.78170.35
10 Carnegie Mellon C3–925.0%180019313 62 1714.27186.53
10 Pittsburgh B3–925.0%165020216 51 2014.93163.37
12 Edinboro1–118.3%128020015 44 911.19128.00
Case Western B0–120.0%       

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2017 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read