2006 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament

Date:	Friday, April 7, 2006 – Saturday, April 8, 2006
Host:	University of Maryland-College Park (College Park, MD)

Division I Pool A

Teams are ordered within each pool based on their performance. The order of finish within each pool may depend on tiebreaker games not shown. Ranks for the tournament as a whole are displayed on the Standings tab.

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
UC Berkeley	7–0	100.0%	2995	164	31	66	23	20.46	365.24
Chicago A	6–1	85.7%	2485	163	24	62	17	18.49	304.91
U of Rochester	4–3	57.1%	1760	162	16	55	19	15.00	217.28
Williams A	4–3	57.1%	1370	141	10	47	13	14.30	194.33
Texas A&M	3–4	42.9%	1390	138	13	45	10	13.71	201.45
Minnesota	2–5	28.6%	1240	158	4	51	13	13.36	156.96
Harding	2–5	28.6%	890	163	1	45	11	10.43	109.20
Williams B	0–7	0.0%	435	115	2	23	5	8.00	75.65

Pool B

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Illinois	7–0	100.0%	2590	162	27	60	18	19.25	319.75
UCLA	5–2	71.4%	2195	161	13	66	8	17.47	272.67
Princeton	5–2	71.4%	2105	161	13	65	15	17.12	261.49
Yale	4–3	57.1%	1655	156	8	60	18	15.07	212.18
Texas	3–4	42.9%	1785	156	14	57	18	15.42	228.85
Wisconsin	3–4	42.9%	1425	159	13	48	21	14.02	179.25
McGill	1–6	14.3%	985	163	8	37	9	12.00	120.86
Florida	0–7	0.0%	830	162	4	38	10	10.48	102.47

Pool C

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Brown	7–0	100.0%	1880	145	15	63	5	13.64	259.31
Virginia	6–1	85.7%	1965	136	21	56	18	15.53	288.97
Chicago B	5–2	71.4%	1405	134	11	53	20	12.66	209.70
Carleton College	4–3	57.1%	1680	143	11	55	6	15.08	234.97
Carnegie Mellon	3–4	42.9%	1315	145	8	51	13	12.71	181.38
Georgia	2–5	28.6%	435	145	3	24	7	6.85	60.00
Simon Fraser	1–6	14.3%	430	142	4	20	3	7.71	60.56
USC	0–7	0.0%	0	0	0	0	0	0.00	0.00

Pool D

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Stanford	6–1	85.7%	2115	147	10	63	7	18.77	287.76
VCU	6–1	85.7%	2150	155	18	65	13	15.60	277.42
Vanderbilt	4–3	57.1%	1485	159	6	61	19	13.13	186.79
North Carolina	3–4	42.9%	1560	153	9	60	22	13.75	203.92
Michigan	3–4	42.9%	1360	151	14	48	22	13.00	180.13
Dartmouth	3–4	42.9%	1190	156	4	48	21	14.52	152.56
Rutgers	2–5	28.6%	1160	151	4	48	3	12.21	153.64
Ottawa	1–6	14.3%	820	152	10	36	11	7.93	107.89

Division II Pool A

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Stanford	6–1	85.7%	2560	148	21	71	22	17.88	345.95
Florida State	6–1	85.7%	1555	153	12	57	20	13.12	203.27
Grinnell	4–3	57.1%	1400	152	10	52	11	12.66	184.21
Oklahoma State	4–3	57.1%	1350	153	10	51	15	12.54	176.47
Chicago	3–4	42.9%	1260	152	18	33	18	14.71	165.79
George Washington	3–4	42.9%	1090	150	12	40	4	10.19	145.33
Emory-Oxford	1–6	14.3%	600	155	4	31	9	7.86	77.42
State College-Manatee	1–6	14.3%	495	149	1	29	8	7.67	66.44

Pool B

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Amherst	7–0	100.0%	2020	150	15	61	12	16.38	269.33
Princeton A	6–1	85.7%	2130	144	11	69	9	16.50	295.83
Georgia	5–2	71.4%	1550	144	6	57	13	15.16	215.28
Virginia	3–4	42.9%	1265	143	6	48	9	13.70	176.92
UCLA	3–4	42.9%	1025	143	5	50	17	9.73	143.36
Coastal Alabama - South	3–4	42.9%	975	145	4	44	15	11.46	134.48
Louisiana-Lafayette	1–6	14.3%	825	152	6	38	7	8.86	108.55
Cloud County CC	0–7	0.0%	225	153	1	17	12	5.56	29.41

Pool C

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Caltech	6–1	85.7%	2125	163	18	70	23	14.43	260.74
Princeton B	6–1	85.7%	1630	163	11	63	21	12.70	200.00
Columbia	5–2	71.4%	1770	163	11	68	25	13.29	217.18
Johns Hopkins	4–3	57.1%	1315	160	5	58	7	11.03	164.38
Broward	4–3	57.1%	1125	159	9	43	11	11.83	141.51
Oklahoma	2–5	28.6%	980	163	3	48	13	10.20	120.25
Bevill-Jasper	1–6	14.3%	590	160	4	34	12	6.58	73.75
Hamline	0–7	0.0%	325	163	0	26	5	3.46	39.88

Pool D

Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	I	PPB	PP20TUH
Harvard	7–0	100.0%	2675	155	13	80	12	18.71	345.16
Michigan	6–1	85.7%	1465	155	10	54	16	13.36	189.03
Carleton College	4–3	57.1%	1490	156	3	60	16	14.68	191.03
Maryland	3–4	42.9%	1415	154	11	51	10	12.74	183.77
Vanderbilt	3–4	42.9%	1190	148	3	53	14	12.23	160.81
Southern Virginia	2–5	28.6%	955	152	5	45	17	10.30	125.66
Valencia	2–5	28.6%	680	155	5	35	28	9.88	87.74
Snead State	1–6	14.3%	815	155	7	36	15	9.88	105.16

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read