Houston Scholar Bowl Fall Invitational

Date:	Saturday, November 15, 2025
Host:	Houston R-1 School (Houston, MO)
Scoring Rules:	NAQT w/ Bouncebacks, w/o Interrupts
Questions:	IS-242

Competitive Division

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2026 Small School National Championship Tournament (Traditional Public Schools Division).
The highlighted teams marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2026 High School National Championship Tournament.
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	PPB	BB%	PP20TUH
1^A^B	Fair Grove	8–0	100.0%	2330	160	8	78	14.53	22.8%	291.25
2^B	Springfield Central A	7–1	87.5%	2410	160	20	63	14.10	34.1%	301.25
3^A^B	Weaubleau	5–3	62.5%	2020	160	6	69	13.07	24.5%	252.50
4^B	Kickapoo A	5–3	62.5%	2085	160	9	63	14.17	27.5%	260.62
5^B	Hillcrest	4–4	50.0%	1740	160	12	58	11.14	19.2%	217.50
6^B	Rolla	3–5	37.5%	1635	160	11	45	11.79	28.3%	204.38
7^A	Houston	6–2	75.0%	1935	160	7	70	13.12	15.0%	241.88
8	Springfield Central B	4–4	50.0%	1260	160	4	48	10.19	15.2%	157.50
9	Marshfield	3–5	37.5%	1605	160	11	52	11.11	19.3%	200.62
10^A	Clever A	1–7	12.5%	1195	160	7	44	10.00	10.4%	149.38
10^A	Salem A	1–7	12.5%	1035	160	3	39	10.24	13.2%	129.38
10	Glendale A	1–7	12.5%	990	160	2	35	12.16	11.1%	123.75

The highlighted team qualified for the 2026 Small School National Championship Tournament (Traditional Public Schools Division).
#	Team	W–L	%	Points	TUH	P	TU	PPB	BB%	PP20TUH
1	Osage	9–0	100.0%	2225	180	11	76	11.61	31.9%	247.22
2	Capital City A	8–1	88.9%	1965	180	9	77	9.88	27.3%	218.33
3	Thayer A	7–2	77.8%	1670	160	6	71	8.18	26.7%	208.75
4	Capital City B	6–3	66.7%	895	160	3	39	7.86	12.7%	111.88
5	Kickapoo B	4–3	57.1%	740	120	6	33	6.92	7.6%	123.33
6	Salem B	5–2	71.4%	1020	120	4	46	7.20	22.2%	170.00
7	Sullivan B	3–4	42.9%	885	140	1	40	8.78	11.1%	126.43
8	Parkview	6–2	75.0%	955	161	1	44	7.27	15.4%	118.63
9	Eugene A	5–2	71.4%	880	140	4	46	5.60	11.6%	125.71
10	Bakersfield	4–3	57.1%	740	120	2	35	6.76	14.7%	123.33
11	Owensville	3–5	37.5%	570	160	0	35	4.00	7.3%	71.25
12	Sullivan A	4–4	50.0%	915	160	1	46	7.02	11.7%	114.38
12	Capital City C	3–4	42.9%	585	140	1	30	5.81	9.1%	83.57
14	Eugene B	3–4	42.9%	395	120	1	22	4.35	6.2%	65.83
14	Thayer B	3–5	37.5%	695	160	3	30	5.76	13.4%	86.88
16	Salem C	4–4	50.0%	575	160	3	32	5.43	2.3%	71.88
17	Clever B	3–4	42.9%	250	120	0	19	2.11	3.2%	41.67
18	Sullivan C	2–6	25.0%	535	161	1	31	4.06	10.1%	66.46
19	Lutie	2–6	25.0%	310	161	0	17	6.88	2.4%	38.51
20	Glendale B	1–7	12.5%	350	161	0	22	2.73	6.5%	43.48
21	Norwood	0–7	0.0%	180	140	0	10	3.00	4.1%	25.71
	Lockwood	0–7	0.0%

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.