• Tournaments
• 2023 Buzzword Holiday Extravaganza
• Results
• Single-Game
• Current: Standings

2023 Buzzword Holiday Extravaganza

Standings

If you played in this Buzzword competition and want to see your personal results, you will need to log in.

#	Awards	Player	Region	# Correct	% Correct	Average Correct Celerity	Std. Dev. Celerity	Score
1		Craig Barker	Michigan	49	98.0%	.407	.239	723
2		Ramapriya Rangaraju	Kentucky	48	96.0%	.317	.198	657
3		Stephanie Perkins	Missouri	47	94.0%	.338	.233	656
4		Jason Sterlacci	New Jersey	50	100.0%	.264	.197	652
5		Dylan Minarik	Illinois	48	96.0%	.296	.195	639
6		McKinnie Lee Sizemore	Florida	49	98.0%	.261	.222	637
7		John Kocsis	Virginia	47	94.0%	.298	.223	632
8		Carlos Hernandez Fisher	Canada	41	82.0%	.449	.230	631
9		Elisabeth Evan	Ohio	46	92.0%	.307	.217	625
10		Scott Latchem	California	47	94.0%	.284	.214	625
11		Chris Miller	Kentucky	45	90.0%	.324	.220	620
12		Seoan Webb	United Kingdom	44	88.0%	.331	.240	609
13		Dan Puma	Illinois	45	90.0%	.306	.167	609
14		Adam Escandell	Texas	47	94.0%	.261	.194	608
15		Jack Rousseau	California	45	90.0%	.301	.213	607
16		John Monahan	United Kingdom	46	92.0%	.282	.184	607
17		Aaron Dos Remedios	Canada	46	92.0%	.277	.193	607
18		Martin Poteralski	Georgia	47	94.0%	.263	.191	607
19		Matthew Marcotte	California	45	90.0%	.300	.184	605
20		Myron Meyer	South Dakota	44	88.0%	.305	.254	599
21		Tucker Warner	New York	47	94.0%	.244	.208	599
22		Michael Olson	Minnesota	45	90.0%	.286	.207	596
23		Jennifer Quail	Michigan	43	86.0%	.317	.255	589
24		Harley Andrew	Wisconsin	45	90.0%	.276	.229	589
25		Jason Palmer	Ohio	48	96.0%	.199	.183	588
26		Benjamin Livingston	Minnesota	45	90.0%	.266	.223	587
27		Eric Douglass	South Carolina	43	86.0%	.311	.183	585
28		Andrew Almas	Canada	45	90.0%	.260	.221	584
29		Craig Moysey	Canada	40	80.0%	.387	.231	582
30		Teddy Knox	Illinois	45	90.0%	.256	.201	581
31		Rahul Rao-Pothuraju	New York	46	92.0%	.235	.202	581
32		James Carberry	Louisiana	46	92.0%	.231	.221	581
33		Steven Brown	Virginia	43	86.0%	.306	.222	580
34		Clifford Galiher	California	43	86.0%	.304	.215	579
35		Michael Coates	Idaho	44	88.0%	.275	.229	577
36		William Travis	Texas	40	80.0%	.370	.198	575
37		Tomás Aguilar-Fraga	Indiana	43	86.0%	.292	.219	575
38		Randall Eng	New York	44	88.0%	.265	.188	575
39		Nora Denning	Ohio	44	88.0%	.269	.235	574
40		Michael Bentley	Washington	45	90.0%	.247	.218	574
41		Candy Murphy	Virginia	46	92.0%	.209	.214	568
42		Joseph Langas	Texas	43	86.0%	.277	.239	566
43		Ryan Luptak	Illinois	45	90.0%	.229	.208	566
44		Jenn Tulo	Virginia	44	88.0%	.251	.198	565
45		Jon Violet	United Kingdom	42	84.0%	.292	.266	564
46		Brian Lipinski	District of Columbia	44	88.0%	.256	.165	564
47		Amy Whitelaw	Virginia	46	92.0%	.206	.206	564
48		Alex Dzurick	Missouri	47	94.0%	.188	.175	564
49		James Denning	Ohio	46	92.0%	.200	.209	562
50		Drew Scheeler	Ohio	41	82.0%	.318	.226	561
51		Michael Arjona	Georgia	44	88.0%	.243	.213	561
52		Trevor Greissinger	Wisconsin	45	90.0%	.219	.209	561
53		Tyler Berry	Canada	44	88.0%	.239	.233	560
54		Nate Kane	Arizona	40	80.0%	.345	.251	559
55		Shannon Jamison	Virginia	42	84.0%	.288	.240	559
56		Jack Wolverton	Missouri	44	88.0%	.234	.197	558
57		Deleena Simon	Michigan	46	92.0%	.185	.213	556
58		Erik Nickels	California	44	88.0%	.230	.195	554
59		Greg Peterson	Illinois	40	80.0%	.327	.198	552
60		Jenna Hull	California	45	90.0%	.210	.225	552
61		Michael Patison	Texas	42	84.0%	.273	.184	549
62		William Bostleman	Ohio	44	88.0%	.220	.205	549
63		William Neiswanger	Washington	46	92.0%	.178	.188	547
64		Phil Castagna	Pennsylvania	42	84.0%	.258	.229	546
65		Greg Garbee	Florida	43	86.0%	.239	.222	546
66		Kristin Pierce	Missouri	44	88.0%	.202	.225	541
67		John Riss	Illinois	45	90.0%	.178	.205	540
68		Kelly Rabin	Washington	41	82.0%	.279	.208	539
69		Jonathan Hugendubler	Maryland	45	90.0%	.179	.163	538
70		Anthony Peek	Louisiana	41	82.0%	.270	.233	537
71		Mike Malloy	Minnesota	41	82.0%	.264	.251	533
72		David Cruickshank	United Kingdom	43	86.0%	.216	.200	532
73		Ashwath Seetharaman	Texas	44	88.0%	.186	.220	531
74		Arlo Lyle	Arkansas	43	86.0%	.205	.176	525
75		Natalie Schermer	Washington	44	88.0%	.179	.208	525
76		Joshua Levit	Massachusetts	39	78.0%	.305	.219	524
77		Akosua Asante	Canada	42	84.0%	.228	.184	524
78		Bradley Kirksey	North Carolina	44	88.0%	.173	.169	522
79		Nick Matchen	Illinois	42	84.0%	.214	.177	521
80		Chris Hale	Virginia	43	86.0%	.202	.207	521
81		Kenji Shimizu	Michigan	39	78.0%	.290	.224	516
82		Sarah Whisenhunt	Virginia	39	78.0%	.283	.248	516
83		Brian Hight	Michigan	39	78.0%	.282	.219	515
84		Jonathan Pinyan	New Jersey	42	84.0%	.207	.168	515
85		Kurt Taube	Ohio	42	84.0%	.204	.219	513
86		Aaron Lichtig	Maryland	43	86.0%	.178	.187	513
87		Joey Goldman	United Kingdom	38	76.0%	.304	.240	512
88		Michael Joy	Michigan	41	82.0%	.227	.194	512
89		Kevin Lei	Canada	45	90.0%	.129	.165	510
90		Andrey Goder	California	46	92.0%	.102	.135	510
91		Radu Popescu	Canada	41	82.0%	.211	.185	507
92		Geoffrey McGee	New Jersey	42	84.0%	.185	.183	506
93		Quinn McGarry	Missouri	39	78.0%	.261	.219	505
94		Hidehiro Anto	California	44	88.0%	.141	.159	503
95		Matthew Grieco	New York	40	80.0%	.225	.194	502
96		Gail Celio	Minnesota	39	78.0%	.246	.217	499
97		Josh Hill	Arkansas	41	82.0%	.190	.225	499
98		Jared Cubilla	Canada	40	80.0%	.221	.189	498
99		Darren Petrosino	New Jersey	42	84.0%	.165	.196	496
100		Owen Cooper	Alabama	36	72.0%	.333	.284	494
101		Bill Rubin	North Carolina	40	80.0%	.199	.200	489
102		Jacob O'Rourke	Missouri	42	84.0%	.158	.153	489
103		Sarah Benner	Ohio	41	82.0%	.183	.199	488
104		Victor Pavao	Massachusetts	37	74.0%	.278	.229	487
105		Joshua Grischow	Ohio	44	88.0%	.113	.115	487
106		Annika Peterson	Michigan	39	78.0%	.213	.232	485
107		Chauncey Lo	California	40	80.0%	.194	.181	484
108		Alec Chao	District of Columbia	40	80.0%	.187	.165	481
109		Tim Kachur	Massachusetts	39	78.0%	.185	.174	471
110		Pete Pfutzenreuter	Minnesota	39	78.0%	.191	.227	470
111		Jason Triplett	Indiana	39	78.0%	.178	.195	467
112		Danielle Long	Illinois	39	78.0%	.170	.244	466
113		Julie McDermitt	Illinois	38	76.0%	.198	.211	465
114		Bryan Householder	Ohio	41	82.0%	.127	.172	464
115		Julian Saddy	Canada	40	80.0%	.152	.177	463
116		Mazin Omer	Ohio	35	70.0%	.276	.219	459
117		Daniel DeFelippis	Illinois	41	82.0%	.118	.140	458
118		Samuel McCoy	Pennsylvania	36	72.0%	.237	.257	457
119		Delano Barnes	Texas	41	82.0%	.114	.132	457
120		Nathan Hamer	United Kingdom	38	76.0%	.184	.237	456
121		George Atendido	Minnesota	39	78.0%	.151	.171	453
122		Rebecca Thomas	Georgia	35	70.0%	.255	.225	451
123		Mitchell Rimerman	California	37	74.0%	.194	.214	450
124		Thomas Credeur	Louisiana	40	80.0%	.112	.156	448
125		Blake Andert	Minnesota	38	76.0%	.165	.203	447
126		Brynn Jones	Illinois	34	68.0%	.268	.184	444
127		Rose Liu	California	40	80.0%	.106	.142	443
128		Ankit Aggarwal	California	36	72.0%	.191	.204	435
129		Susan Corbus	Illinois	38	76.0%	.127	.160	431
130		Kenneth Martin	Illinois	37	74.0%	.144	.179	428
131		Matt Wadden	New Jersey	34	68.0%	.217	.204	423
132		Liz Berry	Canada	33	66.0%	.235	.256	420
133		Wesley Mathews	Arizona	34	68.0%	.200	.216	419
134		Michael Turner	South Carolina	33	82.5%	.234	.219	415
135		Kevin McCabe	Colorado	37	74.0%	.115	.169	414
136		Trevor Nigus	Illinois	35	70.0%	.171	.214	412
137		Losha Ndemeno-Tegomoh	Minnesota	36	72.0%	.132	.122	407
138		Jake Sundberg	Louisiana	35	70.0%	.146	.174	405
139		Will Singleton	Ohio	37	74.0%	.092	.153	403
140		Gregor McGee	Oregon	35	70.0%	.136	.183	402
141		Aaron Kozak	Canada	34	68.0%	.124	.222	381
142		Michael Shang	Maryland	30	60.0%	.156	.155	351
143		Jayde Kim	Texas	32	64.0%	.090	.114	349
144		James Dowd	Hawaii	20	83.3%	.259	.233	259
145		Payton Brooks	Connecticut	22	44.0%	.157	.255	259
146		Hyuntae Yoo	Texas	20	40.0%	.028	.072	206
147		Mike McGraw	Pennsylvania	10	83.3%	.434	.237	152
148		Ryan Rosenberg	California	6	75.0%	.169	.185	69
149		Michael Kettler	Ohio	3	100.0%	.194	.260	37
150		Russ Hart	New York	1	100.0%	.544	-1.000	17

Celerity is the fraction of the question that had not been read at the time of a buzz (for which a correct answer was provided). 1.000 is an immediate buzz, .500 is an answer given halfway through the question in terms of time on the sound recording, and .000 is an answer given at the very end.