NAQT Great Lakes Sectional

Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016
Host: Youngstown State University (Youngstown, OH)
Scoring Rules: NAQT

Division I (SCT-16)

#UGTeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1A Michigan B7–0100.0%338515745 61 2220.85431.21
2A Michigan A6–185.7%333015444 59 1821.07432.47
3 1B Michigan State A5–271.4%16751518 62 1514.85221.85
4 2 Kenyon4–357.1%181514110 58 916.62257.45
5 Pittsburgh A3–442.9%136014011 47 1113.45194.29
5 3 Carnegie Mellon A2–528.6%127514110 48 511.75180.85
7 Case Western A1–614.3%8751386 35 1111.95126.81
8 4 Wright State A0–70.0%6751404 30 1110.8896.43

The highlighted teams marked with ‘A’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) (rating values).

The highlighted team marked with ‘B’ qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division I) via the Undergraduate ranking.

Division II (SCT-16DII) Jump to Division I

#TeamW–L%PointsTUHPTUIPPBPP20TUH
1 Penn State A10–190.9%383020547 75 2320.41373.66
2 Ohio State A10–190.9%373020627 100 718.58362.14
3 Penn State B8–372.7%371020332 91 1619.51365.52
3 Carnegie Mellon B8–372.7%318520435 75 3018.73312.25
5 Ohio State B7–463.6%270019529 67 2317.81276.92
6 Michigan State B5–645.5%325521533 79 2618.75302.79
6 Michigan C5–645.5%236520324 70 1514.68233.00
6 Pittsburgh B5–645.5%228020121 69 1515.00226.87
9 Case Western B3–827.3%180519813 61 1614.59182.32
9 Wright State B3–827.3%150020813 53 912.42144.23
11 Edinboro1–109.1%12502086 55 2612.13120.19
11 Kent State1–109.1%2752082 16 97.2226.44

The highlighted teams qualified for the 2016 Intercollegiate Championship Tournament (Division II) (rating values).

Explanation of Statistics

Confused about all these statistics? We’ve prepared an overview.

Read